Geberbauer C W
J Healthc Mater Manage. 1988 Feb-Mar;6(2):40, 42, 44-5.
When comparing the cost of a product that requires labor-intensive manufacturing processes (e.g., IV admixtures) with the cost of the same product in a ready-to-use form (e.g., premixed, small-volume, parenteral drugs), all costs and potential savings associated with both forms of the product must be taken into consideration. An additional consideration in determining whether finished products should be purchased requires an analysis of the savings achieved in the pharmacy department in relation to the hospital's cost-reduction strategy. Little purpose would be served if the pharmacy pursued options that benefited only the pharmacy but not the hospital in general. It is time that all hospital departments challenge their staffs to maximize their efforts not only to control costs, but to reduce them as well. The greatest yield in the hospital pharmacy is derived through efforts directed at reducing supply expenditures. One reduction method worthy of analysis is use of premixed, small-volume, parenteral drugs. If it can be shown that the overall cost reduction will result from a decrease in waste, clinical pharmacy intervention through the pharmacy and therapeutics committees, targeted drug programs, quality assurance activities, and reduced operating expenses associated with premixed products, their acquisition price can be justified.
在比较需要劳动密集型制造工艺的产品(例如静脉输液混合剂)的成本与即用型产品(例如预混小容量注射用药物)的成本时,必须考虑与这两种产品形式相关的所有成本和潜在节省。在确定是否应购买成品时,另一个需要考虑的因素是分析药房部门相对于医院成本降低策略所实现的节省。如果药房采取的方案仅使药房受益而不能使整个医院受益,那就没有什么意义了。现在是时候让所有医院科室要求其员工不仅要最大限度地努力控制成本,还要努力降低成本。医院药房最大的收益来自于旨在减少供应支出的努力。一种值得分析的减少成本的方法是使用预混小容量注射用药物。如果能够证明总体成本降低是由于浪费减少、通过药事和治疗学委员会进行临床药学干预、有针对性的药物计划、质量保证活动以及与预混产品相关的运营费用降低所导致的,那么其采购价格就是合理的。