High court's override on Patrick renews concerns about peer review risk.
作者信息
Halper H R, Kazon P M
出版信息
Bus Health. 1988 Jul;5(9):40-1.
PMID:10288490
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
High court's override on Patrick renews concerns about peer review risk.
Bus Health. 1988 Jul;5(9):40-1.
2
Perspectives. The Patrick case: implications for peer review.
Mcgraw Hills Med Health. 1988 May 30;42(22):suppl 4 p..
3
A tale of four cases: Patrick, Bolt, Mitchell, and Oltz.
Med Staff Couns. 1989 Spring;3(2):51-4.
4
Antitrust. Is quality review in jeopardy?
Med World News. 1988 Jun 27;29(12):34-6, 38, 43-7.
5
Medical peer review under legal knife.医学同行评议面临法律审查。
Natl J (Wash). 1988 Mar 26;20(13):820.
6
What competition can do to peer review.竞争对同行评审的影响。
Med Econ. 1985 Aug 19;62(17):122-7, 131-9.
7
Peer review in the wake of Patrick.
Trustee. 1988 Jul;41(7):17.
8
Peer review after Patrick.
J Health Hosp Law. 1988 Jun;21(6):135-9.
9
The Patrick case: will it hinder peer review?
Hospitals. 1988 Jun 20;62(12):56.
10
Peer review immunity after Patrick v. Burget.
Healthspan. 1988 Jun;5(6):2-5.
Zotero 插件