Mullner R M, Whiteis D S
Health Policy. 1988 Oct;10(2):123-35. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(88)90001-2.
Closure of rural community hospitals in the U.S.A. is a growing and important trend with serious implications for rural communities and the overall health care system. This study analyzes characteristics of all U.S. rural hospitals that closed between 1980 and 1986. Variables correlated with risk of closure--for-profit ownership status, non-government not-for-profit ownership status, number of other hospitals in the county, presence of a nursing or other long-term care unit, few facilities and services offered, lack of accreditation by the Joint Commission of Accreditation of Hospitals, lack of membership in a multihospital system--indicate that a rural hospital's survival depends upon its ability to compete and adapt in a volatile, competitive health care marketplace. five policy options are discussed: changes in Medicare payments, expansion of the number of hospitals designated as sole Community Hospitals, the use of swing beds, establishment of state offices of rural health, and short-term federal and state grants. Allowing hospitals the flexibility to adapt and compete, while ensuring adequate quality health care to rural residents, is suggested as the priority in rural health policy.
美国乡村社区医院的关闭是一个日益凸显且重要的趋势,对乡村社区和整个医疗保健系统都有着严重影响。本研究分析了1980年至1986年间关闭的所有美国乡村医院的特征。与关闭风险相关的变量——营利性所有制状况、非政府非营利性所有制状况、县内其他医院的数量、是否设有护理或其他长期护理单元、提供的设施和服务较少、未获得医院评审联合委员会的认证、未加入多医院系统——表明乡村医院的生存取决于其在动荡、竞争激烈的医疗保健市场中竞争和适应的能力。讨论了五种政策选择:医疗保险支付的变化、指定为唯一社区医院的医院数量的增加、摇摆床的使用、设立州农村卫生办公室以及短期联邦和州拨款。建议在农村卫生政策中优先考虑让医院有适应和竞争的灵活性,同时确保为农村居民提供足够质量的医疗保健。