• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品与治疗学委员会访谈:确保有效药品目录系统的策略

P & T Committee interview: strategies to ensure an effective formulary system.

作者信息

Riff L, Hutchinson R

出版信息

Hosp Formul. 1988 Nov;23(11):901-4, 907-8.

PMID:10290754
Abstract

In this exclusive Hospital Formulary interview, Louise Riff, MD, and Richard Hutchinson, PharmD, highlight the challenges of their 15-year tenure as the Chairman and Secretary of the University of Illinois Hospital P & T Committee. While continuity in formal leadership has been advantageous, they also attribute part of their success to the diverse informal leadership that develops each year. Drs. Riff and Hutchinson discuss how the P & T Committee has become accomplished at making what once were controversial decisions, such as removing the number one drug from their formulary as a cost-containment strategy. They also describe the recent development of an improved ADR reporting system and the progress in exchanging formulary decisions with neighboring hospitals. This P & T Committee, however, expresses some discomfort with the evaluation of high-tech drug products, since significant cost implications without therapeutic guarantees create new dimensions in decision-making for their Committee.

摘要

在这次独家的医院处方集访谈中,医学博士路易丝·里夫和药学博士理查德·哈钦森强调了他们担任伊利诺伊大学医院药品与治疗学委员会主席和秘书15年期间所面临的挑战。虽然正式领导的连续性带来了好处,但他们也将部分成功归功于每年发展起来的多样化非正式领导。里夫博士和哈钦森博士讨论了药品与治疗学委员会如何在做出曾经有争议的决策方面取得了成就,比如作为成本控制策略从他们的处方集中移除头号药物。他们还描述了改进后的药品不良反应报告系统的最新发展以及与邻近医院交换处方集决策方面的进展。然而,这个药品与治疗学委员会对高科技药品的评估表示有些不安,因为巨大的成本影响且没有治疗保障给他们委员会的决策带来了新的维度。

相似文献

1
P & T Committee interview: strategies to ensure an effective formulary system.药品与治疗学委员会访谈:确保有效药品目录系统的策略
Hosp Formul. 1988 Nov;23(11):901-4, 907-8.
2
Formulary management at a tertiary-care facility: P&T committee interview.三级医疗机构的处方集管理:药品与治疗学委员会访谈
Hosp Formul. 1988 Feb;23(2):162-8, 172-3.
3
P & T Committee interview: Promoting rational drug use.
Hosp Formul. 1988 Apr;23(4):359-62, 365-6, 369.
4
P & T Committee interview: communication and education contribute to an effective formulary system.药品与治疗学委员会访谈:沟通与教育有助于建立有效的药品目录系统。
Hosp Formul. 1989 May;24(5):281-4, 286-7.
5
Challenges of a P & T Committee in a community teaching hospital.社区教学医院药事与治疗学委员会面临的挑战
Hosp Formul. 1990 Aug;25(8):878-82, 886.
6
Communicating P & T guidelines: how one committee meets the challenge.传达药品和治疗指南:一个委员会如何应对挑战。
Hosp Formul. 1987 Jul;22(7):651-4, 657.
7
P & T Committee interview: Establishing and maintaining a dynamic formulary.药品与治疗学委员会访谈:建立和维护动态药品目录
Hosp Formul. 1988 Jan;23(1):48-53.
8
Achieving rational therapeutics through consensus-based protocols and follow-up.
Hosp Formul. 1990 Mar;25(3):283-4, 289-94.
9
Effective decision-making in a changing healthcare environment: a P & T Committee interview.在不断变化的医疗环境中进行有效决策:药品与治疗学委员会访谈
Hosp Formul. 1989 Feb;24(2):85-7, 90, 93 passim.
10
Formulary decision making in a specialty hospital: effective management of potent and costly drug therapies.专科医院的处方集决策:强效且昂贵药物疗法的有效管理
Hosp Formul. 1990 Jun;25(6):639-44.