Cirn J T
Contemp Pharm Pract. 1980 Summer;3(3):180-8.
The Iowa Medicaid Drug Program recently performed a 2-year experiment in capitation reimbursement of pharmacies in two counties. The aim was to reduce costs and improve the quality of services by creating new economic incentives for pharmacists to expand their role in drug use control. This study is part of an evaluation of this experiment. It summarizes the responses to personal interviews held with the owners or managers of the 11 participating pharmacies and with four employee pharmacists. Almost all pharmacists considered capitation a big improvement over the traditional fee-for-service system of Medicaid payment. The benefit most commonly cites was the advance payment system that some respondents said reduced paperwork and improved their cash flow. Value was also seen in requiring Medicaid patients to designate and obtain services from a single pharmacy, but the pharmacists complained about lack of accurate lists of eligible patients and described wide variations in enforcement of the lock-in. Diversity also appeared in their discussion of problems encountered in making product substitutions. Deficiencies in comprehension and motivation were found to be especially prevalent among the salaried employees.
爱荷华医疗补助药品计划最近在两个县进行了一项为期两年的药房按人头报销实验。目的是通过为药剂师创造新的经济激励措施,扩大他们在药物使用控制中的作用,从而降低成本并提高服务质量。本研究是对该实验评估的一部分。它总结了对11家参与药房的所有者或经理以及四名药剂师雇员进行个人访谈的回复。几乎所有药剂师都认为按人头报销比传统的医疗补助付费服务系统有了很大改进。最常提到的好处是预付款系统,一些受访者表示该系统减少了文书工作并改善了现金流。要求医疗补助患者指定并从单一药房获得服务也被认为有价值,但药剂师抱怨缺乏符合条件患者的准确名单,并描述了锁定执行中的巨大差异。在他们对产品替代中遇到的问题的讨论中也出现了多样性。发现理解和积极性不足在受薪员工中尤为普遍。