Yesalis C E, Norwood G J, Lipson D P, Helling D K, Fisher W P, Burmeister L F
Med Care. 1980 Aug;18(8):816-28. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198008000-00003.
This article evaluates changes in the rate of generic substitution as well as the appropriateness of such changes in dispensing behavior when the conventional fee-for-service system for reimbursement of pharmacists is replaced by a capitation system. The fee-for-service system under Medicaid usually covers ingredient costs plus a fixed professional dispensing fee. The capitation system provides a cash payment per Medicaid eligible at the first of each month, which varies by aid category and season of the year. The dispensing behavior of pharmacists in two experimental rural counties is examined during a 1-year preperiod in which the fee-for-service form of reimbursement was employed, as well as a 2-year postperiod in which capitation was used in lieu of fee-for-service payments. The results are compared with pharmacist behavior patterns in two other rural counties which remained on the fee-for-service system over the same 3-year period. The data indicate highly significant increases in both the rate of generic substitution as well as the dollar savings per substitution in the experimental counties after the institution of capitation reimbursement. Using explicit criteria, no substantial differences in the appropriateness of generic substitution were noted between the two financing schemes.
本文评估了在药师报销的传统按服务收费系统被按人头付费系统取代时,通用名药物替换率的变化以及这种配药行为变化的适宜性。医疗补助计划下的按服务收费系统通常涵盖药品成分成本加上固定的专业配药费。按人头付费系统在每月初为每位符合医疗补助条件的人提供现金支付,支付金额因援助类别和一年中的季节而异。研究人员考察了两个实验性乡村县的药师在采用按服务收费报销形式的1年前期以及采用按人头付费代替按服务收费支付的2年后期的配药行为。将结果与另外两个在相同3年期间仍采用按服务收费系统的乡村县的药师行为模式进行比较。数据表明,实行按人头付费报销后,实验县的通用名药物替换率和每次替换节省的费用均大幅增加。使用明确的标准,未发现两种筹资方案在通用名药物替换适宜性方面存在实质性差异。