Friedman B, Pauly M V
Health Care Financ Rev. 1983 Mar;4(3):105-14.
An important aspect of hospital revenue regulation at the State level is the use of retroactive allowances for changes in the volume of service. Arguments favoring non-proportional allowances have been based on statistical studies of marginal cost, together with concerns about fairness toward non-profit enterprises or concerns about various inflationary biases in hospital management. This article attempts to review and clarify the regulatory issues and choices, with the aid of new econometric work that explicitly allows for the effects of transitory as well as expected demand changes on hospital expense. The present analysis is also novel in treating length of stay as an endogenous variable in cost functions. We analyzed cost variation for a panel of over 800 hospitals that reported monthly to Hospital Administrative Services between 1973 and 1978. The central results are that marginal cost of unexpected admissions is about half of average cost, while marginal cost of forecasted admissions is about equal to average cost. We obtained relatively low estimates of the cost of an "empty bed." The study tends to support proportional volume allowances in revenue regulation programs, with perhaps a residual role for selective case review.
州级医院收入监管的一个重要方面是对服务量变化采用追溯津贴。支持非比例津贴的论据基于边际成本的统计研究,以及对非营利企业公平性的担忧或对医院管理中各种通胀偏差的担忧。本文试图借助新的计量经济学研究来回顾和阐明监管问题及选择,该研究明确考虑了暂时性需求变化以及预期需求变化对医院费用的影响。当前分析在将住院时长视为成本函数中的内生变量方面也具有新颖性。我们分析了1973年至1978年间每月向医院行政服务部门报告的800多家医院的成本变化情况。核心结果是,意外入院的边际成本约为平均成本的一半,而预测入院的边际成本约等于平均成本。我们对“空床”成本的估计相对较低。该研究倾向于支持收入监管计划中的比例性服务量津贴,或许选择性病例审查可发挥剩余作用。