Simendinger E A, Pasmore W
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1984 Nov-Dec;29(6):21-35.
Using an intensive interview methodology, this study examines factors that developed or destroyed cooperation in 10 physician-administrator management pairs. The data were collected from a six-multihospital system and another large sectarian teaching hospital. The factors studied included preconceptions, experiences prior to the formation of the pair, the emotional relationship between the two partners, and actions taken by one of the parties that affected the work of both. In general, physicians and administrators agreed more about factors promoting cooperation than factors destroying it. Moreover, few partners accurately assessed their counterparts' reactions to steps taken to promote cooperation. Most were unaware of behaviors reducing the willingness of the other to cooperate. Relationships improved or deteriorated based on beliefs by one partner about the other, rather than accurate perceptions of the other's behavior. The study is relevant to Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs), the new federal financing mechanism for Medicare patients. Recent articles on Medicare's Prospective Payment System (PPS) predict conflicts between physicians and administrators as a result of the DRG program.
本研究采用深入访谈方法,考察了10对医生-管理人员管理组合中促进或破坏合作的因素。数据收集自一个由六家医院组成的系统以及另一家大型教派教学医院。所研究的因素包括先入之见、组合形成之前的经历、双方合作伙伴之间的情感关系,以及一方采取的影响双方工作的行为。总体而言,医生和管理人员在促进合作的因素上比在破坏合作的因素上意见更为一致。此外,很少有合作伙伴能准确评估对方对为促进合作所采取步骤的反应。大多数人没有意识到那些降低对方合作意愿的行为。关系的改善或恶化基于一方对另一方的看法,而非对对方行为的准确认知。该研究与诊断相关分组(DRGs)相关,这是一种针对医疗保险患者的新联邦融资机制。近期有关医疗保险预期支付系统(PPS)的文章预测,DRG计划将导致医生和管理人员之间产生冲突。