Grosskopf S, Valdmanis V
J Health Econ. 1987 Jun;6(2):89-107. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(87)90001-4.
In this paper a technique for assessing the relative performance of firms is introduced and applied to a sample of hospitals in California. Hospitals are compared on the basis of their relative technical efficiency. The reference technology is constructed from observed outputs and inputs (including physicians) using programming techniques, and efficiency is assessed relative to the frontier of the technology using measures similar to those suggested by Farrell. The technique used here imposes no prespecified functional form, allows for multiple outputs and inputs (allowing for differences in case mix), and yields information on the productive performance of individual hospitals. This technique can also be used to determine whether different types of hospitals use different technologies. Our results, although illustrative rather than definitive, suggest that ownership affects 'efficiency' as measured here: public and NFP hospitals have 'different' best practice frontiers, and public hospitals appear to use relatively fewer resources. These results could reflect differences in quality of care by ownership.
本文介绍了一种评估公司相对绩效的技术,并将其应用于加利福尼亚州的一组医院样本。医院根据其相对技术效率进行比较。参考技术是使用编程技术从观察到的产出和投入(包括医生)构建的,并且使用类似于法雷尔提出的那些方法,相对于技术前沿评估效率。这里使用的技术不施加预先指定的函数形式,允许有多个产出和投入(考虑病例组合的差异),并产生关于各个医院生产绩效的信息。该技术还可用于确定不同类型的医院是否使用不同的技术。我们的结果虽然只是说明性的而非确定性的,但表明所有权会影响此处所衡量的“效率”:公立医院和非营利性医院有“不同的”最佳实践前沿,并且公立医院似乎使用的资源相对较少。这些结果可能反映了不同所有制下医疗质量的差异。