Rosenthal M H, Bayait F
Hosp Formul. 1988 Jan;23(1):57-60, 62, 71.
A retrospective study was undertaken at Morristown Memorial Hospital to evaluate the cost impact of buprenorphine HCl, a Schedule V injectable analgesic, versus the Schedule II drugs morphine and meperidine HCl. Time-and-motion studies were conducted in the pharmacy and nursing units. Algorithms were used to determine the cost of auditing, ordering, dispensing, recording, and administering a single dose of Schedule II and Schedule V injectable analgesics. Based on acquisition costs and duration of analgesia, total 24-hour dose costs were calculated for buprenorphine, morphine, and meperidine. The resultant cost comparisons demonstrated that the use of buprenorphine as an alternative to morphine and meperidine for moderate to severe postoperative pain is highly cost-effective and, in this hospital, resulted in a total cost avoidance of up to 67% of analgesic cost per patient per day.
在莫里斯敦纪念医院进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估盐酸丁丙诺啡(一种Ⅴ类注射用镇痛药)与Ⅱ类药物吗啡和盐酸哌替啶相比的成本影响。在药房和护理单元进行了时间和动作研究。使用算法来确定审核、订购、调配、记录和施用单剂量Ⅱ类和Ⅴ类注射用镇痛药的成本。根据采购成本和镇痛持续时间,计算了丁丙诺啡、吗啡和哌替啶的24小时总剂量成本。由此产生的成本比较表明,使用丁丙诺啡替代吗啡和哌替啶治疗中度至重度术后疼痛具有很高的成本效益,在这家医院,每位患者每天可节省高达67%的镇痛成本。