• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纽约养老院护理的边际成本,1983年

The marginal cost of nursing home care, New York, 1983.

作者信息

Nyman J A

出版信息

J Health Econ. 1988 Dec;7(4):393-412. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(88)90022-7.

DOI:10.1016/0167-6296(88)90022-7
PMID:10312841
Abstract

Many believe that nursing homes exclude heavy-care Medicaid patients because their costs exceed the Medicaid reimbursement rate. This paper tests whether this was true in New York in 1983 by calculating the marginal costs of a day of nursing home care and comparing them with the per diem Medicaid reimbursement rate. Contrary to popular beliefs, the marginal cost of the most dependent SNF patient was found to be between $9 and $12 less per patient day than the average Medicaid reimbursement rate for SNF patients. This suggests that excess demand, rather than lower-than-cost reimbursement rates, was creating the heavy-care access problem in New York in 1983. Policy solutions differ depending on the cause of the access problem. The strengths and weaknesses of the different policy solutions are compared.

摘要

许多人认为疗养院拒收重症医疗补助患者是因为他们的费用超过了医疗补助的报销率。本文通过计算疗养院一天护理的边际成本,并将其与按日计算的医疗补助报销率进行比较,来检验1983年在纽约情况是否如此。与普遍看法相反,研究发现,最依赖他人护理的熟练护理机构患者的边际成本比熟练护理机构患者的平均医疗补助报销率每天低9至12美元。这表明,在1983年的纽约,造成重症护理服务获取问题的是需求过剩,而非低于成本的报销率。政策解决方案因获取问题的成因不同而有所差异。本文对不同政策解决方案的优缺点进行了比较。

相似文献

1
The marginal cost of nursing home care, New York, 1983.纽约养老院护理的边际成本,1983年
J Health Econ. 1988 Dec;7(4):393-412. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(88)90022-7.
2
Medicaid payments for long-term care: the use of percentiles in prospective rate setting.
J Long Term Care Adm. 1986 Summer;14(2):15-8.
3
Post-SNF/ICF Medicaid rates.
Contemp Longterm Care. 1990 Jan;13(1):64-5, 82.
4
State Medicaid reimbursement for nursing homes, 1978-86.1978 - 1986年各州医疗补助计划对疗养院的报销情况。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1988 Spring;9(3):33-50.
5
Medical Assistance Program; reasonable cost-related reimbursement for skilled nursing and intermediate care facility services: proposed rule.
Fed Regist. 1979 Apr 18;44(76):23095-9.
6
Explaining state Medicaid nursing home reimbursement.解读州医疗补助计划对疗养院的报销政策。
J Health Soc Policy. 2001;12(4):53-73. doi: 10.1300/J045v12n04_04.
7
Medicaid cost containment: prospective reimbursement for long-term care.医疗补助成本控制:长期护理的前瞻性报销
Inquiry. 1983 Winter;20(4):334-42.
8
Medicaid payment policies for nursing home care: a national survey.疗养院护理的医疗补助支付政策:一项全国性调查。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1991 Fall;13(1):55-72.
9
Financial management. Case mix and quality in Medicaid reimbursement formulas for nursing home care.财务管理。疗养院护理医疗补助报销公式中的病例组合与质量。
Nurs Manage. 1984 May;15(5):64-6.
10
The costs of Medicare patients in nursing homes in the United States: multiple output analysis.美国疗养院中医疗保险患者的费用:多产出分析
J Health Econ. 1989 Dec;8(3):253-70. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(89)90021-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The policy implications of the cost structure of home health agencies.家庭健康机构成本结构的政策含义。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 Feb 12;4(1). doi: 10.5600/mmrr2014-004-01-a03. eCollection 2014.
2
Incremental cost of postacute care in nursing homes.养老院中急性后期护理的增量成本。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 1):105-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01189.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
3
The costs of turnover in nursing homes.养老院人员更替的成本。
Med Care. 2009 Oct;47(10):1039-45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a3cc62.
4
Cost implications of organizing nursing home workforce in teams.组建养老院团队对成本的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1309-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00980.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
5
The effect of state medicaid case-mix payment on nursing home resident acuity.州医疗补助病例组合支付对疗养院居民护理需求程度的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 1):1317-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00545.x.
6
Nursing home spending patterns in the 1990s: the role of nursing home competition and excess demand.20世纪90年代养老院的支出模式:养老院竞争与过度需求的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):1040-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00394.x.
7
Does prospective payment really contain nursing home costs?预期支付真的包含养老院费用吗?
Health Serv Res. 2002 Apr;37(2):251-71. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.022.
8
Does the average cost of home health care vary with case mix?家庭医疗保健的平均成本是否因病例组合而异?
Public Health Rep. 1989 Jul-Aug;104(4):335-41.