• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术评估中的经济考量:以遗传疾病为例。

Economic considerations in technology assessment: the case of genetic disease.

作者信息

Lairson D R, Swint J M

出版信息

Health Policy. 1988;9(3):309-15. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(88)90019-x.

DOI:10.1016/0168-8510(88)90019-x
PMID:10313738
Abstract

This paper describes economic issues pertinent to health care technology assessment. Of interest are the allocation of resources between health and other sectors of the economy, between alternative services within the health sectors, and the costs of producing the services that are selected. These issues are discussed and then illustrated by reference to a specific area of health care technology: screening for and intervention against genetic diseases. It is concluded that investments in screening programs for Tay Sachs disease and Down Syndrome are allocatively efficient. Indications are that such investments are also efficient for interventions against Neural Tube Defects; however, there are complex ethical issues involved. There are many genetic diseases for which screening tests have yet to be developed. As such tests become available, each will have to be evaluated on its own merits relative to alternative health sector investments.

摘要

本文描述了与医疗技术评估相关的经济问题。值得关注的是经济中卫生部门与其他部门之间的资源分配、卫生部门内不同服务之间的资源分配,以及所选服务的生产成本。将对这些问题进行讨论,然后通过参考医疗技术的一个特定领域进行说明:遗传性疾病的筛查和干预。得出的结论是,对泰-萨克斯病和唐氏综合征筛查项目的投资在配置上是有效的。有迹象表明,此类投资对于预防神经管缺陷也是有效的;然而,其中涉及复杂的伦理问题。还有许多遗传性疾病尚未开发出筛查测试。随着此类测试的出现,每项测试都必须根据其相对于卫生部门其他投资的自身价值进行评估。

相似文献

1
Economic considerations in technology assessment: the case of genetic disease.技术评估中的经济考量:以遗传疾病为例。
Health Policy. 1988;9(3):309-15. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(88)90019-x.
2
Ethical Issues with Genetic Testing for Tay-Sachs.泰-萨克斯病基因检测的伦理问题。
J Christ Nurs. 2017 Oct/Dec;34(4):246-249. doi: 10.1097/CNJ.0000000000000426.
3
Genetic screening: triumphs, problems, and controversies.
J Public Health Policy. 1991 Winter;12(4):475-91.
4
The economic returns to community and hospital screening programs for a genetic disease.
Prev Med. 1979 Jul;8(4):463-70. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(79)90320-7.
5
Improving population health or the population itself? Health technology assessment and our genetic future.改善人群健康还是人群本身?卫生技术评估与我们的基因未来。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Spring;20(2):106-14. doi: 10.1017/s0266462304000893.
6
The cost of choice: a price too high in the triple screen for Down syndrome.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;36(3):532-40. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199309000-00011.
7
Medical technology assessment: adequate questions, appropriate methods, valuable answers.
Health Policy. 1988;9(3):267-76. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(88)90014-0.
8
The ovrselling of genetic anxiety.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1982 Oct;12(5):20-7.
9
Risk targetting: an approach to cost-containment.
Health Policy. 1986;6(4):363-72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(86)90051-5.
10
Assessment of the effectiveness of supply-side cost-containment measures.评估供应方成本控制措施的有效性。
Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl. 1991:13-20.