• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依赖呼吸机患者的护理:公共政策考量

Care of the ventilator-dependent patient: public policy considerations.

作者信息

Whitcomb M E

出版信息

Respir Care. 1986 Apr;31(4):283-7.

PMID:10315693
Abstract

Because traditional cost-based reimbursement for acute hospital care has been replaced by the DRG system and other limited-payment approaches, hospital managers are seeking more cost-effective provision of care. This has shortened patient-stay periods in hospitals and increased demand for such alternatives as nursing home and private home care for chronically ill persons, including those dependent on ventilators. At the same time that hospitals seek to discharge patients earlier, patients themselves would prefer to remain in hospitals for long-term care because adequate financial coverage is not available to most of them for alternative-site care. In this setting of conflict between the financial policies of hospitals and those of Medicare and private insurance carriers, it is important to keep quality of care, not financial considerations, as the first consideration when a facility is chosen for long-term care. But the long-term patient, including the patient requiring ventilator support, is caught in the web of competing financial incentives and the fact that there is no consensus on how such care should be organized, delivered, or paid for. The only significant source of funding for long-term nursing home care is Medicaid, which requires the patient to give up his personal assets, including his home; this makes it nearly certain that he will always remain institutionalized. Private insurance carriers have not yet come to terms with the idea that long-term ventilator care can be made less expensive at sites other than hospitals--and thus many patients have no satisfactory answer to the problem of where to receive such care or how it can be financed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

由于急性医院护理基于成本的传统报销方式已被诊断相关分组(DRG)系统及其他有限支付方式所取代,医院管理者正在寻求更具成本效益的护理服务提供方式。这缩短了患者的住院时间,并增加了对诸如疗养院及为慢性病患者(包括依赖呼吸机者)提供的私人家庭护理等替代方式的需求。在医院试图更早让患者出院的同时,患者自身却更愿意留在医院接受长期护理,因为他们中的大多数人没有足够的资金用于替代场所的护理。在医院财务政策与医疗保险及私人保险公司财务政策存在冲突的这种情况下,在选择长期护理机构时,将护理质量而非财务因素作为首要考虑因素非常重要。但是,长期住院患者,包括需要呼吸机支持的患者,陷入了相互竞争的财务激励的困境,而且对于此类护理应如何组织、提供或支付尚无共识。长期疗养院护理的唯一重要资金来源是医疗补助计划,该计划要求患者放弃其个人资产,包括其房屋;这几乎可以肯定他将永远留在机构中。私人保险公司尚未接受这样一种观念,即长期呼吸机护理在医院以外的场所可以降低成本——因此,许多患者对于在哪里接受此类护理以及如何为其融资的问题没有令人满意的答案。(摘要截选至250词)

相似文献

1
Care of the ventilator-dependent patient: public policy considerations.依赖呼吸机患者的护理:公共政策考量
Respir Care. 1986 Apr;31(4):283-7.
2
The nursing home market and hospital discharge delays.养老院市场与医院出院延迟。
Inquiry. 1990 Spring;27(1):73-85.
3
Placement alternatives for long-term ventilator care.
Respir Care. 1986 Apr;31(4):288-93.
4
Should Medicare compensate hospitals for administratively necessary days?医疗保险是否应该就行政必要天数向医院提供补偿?
Milbank Q. 1989;67(1):137-67.
5
Providing home care services in a for-profit environment.
Nurs Clin North Am. 1988 Jun;23(2):387-98.
6
Psychosocial aspects of prolonged ventilator dependency.长期呼吸机依赖的社会心理因素
Respir Care. 1986 Apr;31(4):329-33.
7
Cost containment policies in long-term care.长期护理中的成本控制政策。
Inquiry. 1985 Spring;22(1):7-23.
8
Financing of pediatric home health care. Committee on Child Health Financing, Section on Home Care, American Academy of Pediatrics.儿科家庭医疗保健的融资。美国儿科学会家庭医疗保健分会儿童健康融资委员会。
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):834-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1489.
9
Home is not where the heart is: looming problems of the home care industry.家并非心之所在:家庭护理行业迫在眉睫的问题。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1994 Fall;17(2):227-42.
10
From a constellation to a continuum: policy and management implications for long-term care.
Front Health Serv Manage. 1988 Winter;5(2):3-35.