Suppr超能文献

健康志愿者中地高辛片的生物利用度。

Bioavailability of digoxin tablets in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Lee C H, Park Y J, Sands C D, Jones D W, Trang J M

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Korea.

出版信息

Arch Pharm Res. 1994 Apr;17(2):80-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02974228.

Abstract

The bioavailability of digoxin generic tablets manufactured in Korea (formulations A & B) were compared to a standard (formulation C; Lanoxin brand digoxin, Burroughs Wellcome, USA) in 12 healthy Korean male volunteers (mean age 31.4 years) in a single dose, randomized, complete block crossover study. Using a Latin square design, each of the subjects was randomized to the order number and allocated to each of the three treatments of 0.5 mg oral digoxin. Digoxin concentrations in serum and urine samples collected for 48 hours after dosing were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay and radioimmunoassay, respectively. Treatments were compared by using nonlinear least squares regression analysis to evaluate the following pharmacokinetic parameters: maximum serum concentration (Cmax); time of maximum serum concentration (Tmax); area under the serum concentration-time curve for 0-12 hours (AUC0-12); and cummulative urinary excretion for 0-48 hours (CUE0-48). Mean AUC0-12, Cmax, and CUE0-48 values for formulations B and C were significantly different from formulation A (p < 0.001), but not significantly different from each other. Based on AUC0-12 and CUE0-48, respectively, the relative availability of formulation B was 87.5% and 89.6% and the relative availability of formulation A was 43% and 35% when compared to formulation C (the standard).

摘要

在一项单剂量、随机、完全区组交叉研究中,将韩国生产的地高辛仿制药片(制剂A和B)与标准制剂(制剂C;美国Burroughs Wellcome公司生产的Lanoxin品牌地高辛)在12名健康韩国男性志愿者(平均年龄31.4岁)中进行了比较。采用拉丁方设计,将每个受试者随机分配到序号,并给予三种0.5mg口服地高辛治疗中的一种。给药后48小时收集的血清和尿液样本中的地高辛浓度分别通过荧光偏振免疫测定法和放射免疫测定法进行测量。通过非线性最小二乘法回归分析比较各治疗组,以评估以下药代动力学参数:最大血清浓度(Cmax);最大血清浓度出现时间(Tmax);0至12小时血清浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-12);以及0至48小时累积尿排泄量(CUE0-48)。制剂B和C的平均AUC0-12、Cmax和CUE0-48值与制剂A有显著差异(p<0.001),但彼此之间无显著差异。与制剂C(标准制剂)相比,基于AUC0-12和CUE0-48,制剂B的相对生物利用度分别为87.5%和89.6%,制剂A的相对生物利用度分别为43%和35%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验