Muscle relaxants: the classical receptor theory.
作者信息
Willems J
出版信息
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1976;27(3):85-8.
PMID:1032071
Abstract
According to the classical receptor occupancy theory non-depolarizing and depolarizing muscle relaxants differ in one respect: both types of drugs possess affinity for the cholinergic receptor at the neuro-muscular function, but only the depolarizing relaxants show efficacy. The two properties, affinity and efficacy are independent from each other.
摘要
相似文献
1
Muscle relaxants: the classical receptor theory.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1976;27(3):85-8.
2
Affinity concept and the action of the muscle relaxants.亲和力概念与肌肉松弛剂的作用。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1976;27(3):89-96.
3
Atracurium-receptor kinetics: simple behavior from a mixture.阿曲库铵-受体动力学：混合物的简单行为
Anesth Analg. 1985 Aug;64(8):777-80.
4
[Blockade of the ion channels of the skeletal muscle acetylcholine receptor].[骨骼肌乙酰胆碱受体离子通道的阻断]
Eksp Klin Farmakol. 1998 Nov-Dec;61(6):73-5.
5
Speed of action of various muscle relaxants at the neuromuscular junction binding vs. buffering hypothesis.各种肌肉松弛剂在神经肌肉接头处的作用速度：结合与缓冲假说
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993 Jun;265(3):1181-6.
6
Stoichiometry of the drug-nicotinic receptor interaction.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1973 Jun;185(3):649-52.
7
Ion exchange processes at the neuromuscular junction of voluntary muscle.随意肌神经肌肉接头处的离子交换过程。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1970 Oct;175(1):213-27.
8
Tubocurarine, a partial agonist for cholinergic receptors.
J Neural Transm Suppl. 1983;18:353-61.
9
Clinical pharmacokinetics of the non-depolarising muscle relaxants.非去极化肌松药的临床药代动力学
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1981 Jan-Feb;6(1):25-60. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198106010-00002.
Zotero 插件