Suppr超能文献

重度闭合性颅脑损伤患者弥漫性轴索损伤的临床研究

Clinical studies on diffuse axonal injury in patients with severe closed head injury.

作者信息

Wang H, Duan G, Zhang J, Zhou D

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Nanjing General Hospital of PLA, Clinical Medical School of Nanjing University, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 1998 Jan;111(1):59-62.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the clinical criteria for diagnosing diffuse axonal injury (DAI).

METHODS

Clinical and computed tomographic features of 117 patients with severe closed head injury were analyzed. The authors preliminarily put forward CT diagnostic criteria of DAI, that is, 1) single or multiple small intraparenchymal hemorrhages in the cerebral hemispheres (< 2 cm in diameter); 2) intraventricular hemorrhage; 3) hemorrhage in the corpus callosum; 4) small focal areas of hemorrhage adjacent to the third ventricle (< 2 cm in diameter); and 5) brain stem hemorrhage. All patients were divided into two groups, DAI and non-DAI group, according to the criteria. There were 42 patients in the DAI group and 75 patients in the non-DAI group. The injury causes, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) scores on admission, coexisting injuries and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The relationship between DAI and the outcomes in the patients with severe head injury was analyzed.

RESULTS

Traffic accident was the main injury cause in the cases of DAI. GCS scores on admission in patients with DAI were significantly lower than those in patients without DAI. The incidence of diffuse brain swelling (DBS) in the DAI group was significantly higher than that in the non-DAI group, whereas the incidences of both skull fracture and epidural hematoma (EDH) in the DAI group were significantly lower than those in non-DAI group. There was no significant difference between the incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and subdural hematoma (SDH) in the two groups. The incidence of poor outcome in the DAI group was significantly higher than that in the non-DAI group, although there was no significant difference between the mortalities in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Because DAI is a very important factor worsening the outcome of patients with head injury, it is essential to make a diagnosis as soon as possible. The clinical manifestations of DAI, however, are not specific and DAI does not show directly on CT scans, so it is difficult to make a definite diagnosis. The CT diagnostic criteria of DAI put forward in this article are practicable, though they are by no means perfect.

摘要

目的

探讨弥漫性轴索损伤(DAI)的临床诊断标准。

方法

分析117例重型闭合性颅脑损伤患者的临床及CT特征。作者初步提出DAI的CT诊断标准,即:1)脑实质内单个或多个小出血灶(直径<2 cm);2)脑室内出血;3)胼胝体出血;4)第三脑室旁小灶性出血(直径<2 cm);5)脑干出血。所有患者根据该标准分为DAI组和非DAI组。DAI组42例,非DAI组75例。比较两组的受伤原因、入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、合并伤及预后情况。分析DAI与重型颅脑损伤患者预后的关系。

结果

DAI病例的主要受伤原因是交通事故。DAI患者入院时的GCS评分显著低于非DAI患者。DAI组弥漫性脑肿胀(DBS)的发生率显著高于非DAI组,而DAI组颅骨骨折和硬膜外血肿(EDH)的发生率均显著低于非DAI组。两组蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)和硬膜下血肿(SDH)的发生率无显著差异。DAI组预后不良的发生率显著高于非DAI组,尽管两组死亡率无显著差异。

结论

由于DAI是加重颅脑损伤患者预后的重要因素,因此尽早诊断至关重要。然而,DAI的临床表现不具特异性,且在CT扫描上不直接显示,所以难以做出明确诊断。本文提出的DAI的CT诊断标准虽然并非完美,但切实可行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验