Evans M I, Henry G P, Miller W A, Bui T H, Snidjers R J, Wapner R J, Miny P, Johnson M P, Peakman D, Johnson A, Nicolaides K, Holzgreve W, Ebrahim S A, Babu R, Jackson L
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hutzel Hospital/Wayne State University, 4707 St Antoine Blvd, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Hum Reprod. 1999 May;14(5):1213-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1213.
The development of chromosome-specific probes (CSP) and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) has allowed for very rapid identification of selected numerical abnormalities. We attempt here to determine, in principle, what percentage of abnormalities would be detectable if only CSP-FISH were performed without karyotype for prenatal diagnosis. A total of 146 128 consecutive karyotypes for prenatal diagnosis from eight centres in four countries for 5 years were compared with predicted detection if probes for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y were used, and assuming 100% detection efficiency. A total of 4163 abnormalities (2.85%) were found including 2889 (69. 4%) (trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, numerical sex chromosome abnormalities, and triploidies) which were considered detectable by FISH. Of these, 1274 were mosaics, translocations, deletions, inversions, rings, and markers which would not be considered detectable. CSP-FISH is a useful adjunct to karyotype for high risk situations, and may be appropriate in low risk screening, but should not be seen as a replacement for karyotype as too many structural chromosome abnormalities will be missed.
染色体特异性探针(CSP)和荧光原位杂交(FISH)技术的发展使得快速鉴定特定的数目异常成为可能。我们在此试图从理论上确定,如果仅进行CSP-FISH而非核型分析用于产前诊断,可检测到的异常占比是多少。将来自四个国家八个中心连续5年的146128例产前诊断核型,与假设使用13、18、21、X和Y染色体探针且检测效率为100%时的预测检测结果进行比较。共发现4163例异常(2.85%),其中包括2889例(69.4%)(21三体、18三体、13三体、性染色体数目异常和三倍体),这些被认为可通过FISH检测到。其中,1274例为嵌合体、易位、缺失、倒位、环状染色体和标记染色体,这些不被认为可检测到。CSP-FISH对于高危情况是核型分析的有用辅助手段,在低风险筛查中可能也适用,但不应被视为核型分析的替代方法,因为会遗漏太多染色体结构异常。