• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牛肉的嫩度分级:IV. 美国农业部质量等级对“嫩”牛肉里脊在全熟烹饪时适口性的影响。

Tenderness classification of beef: IV. Effect of USDA quality grade on the palatability of "tender" beef longissimus when cooked well done.

作者信息

Wheeler T L, Shackelford S D, Koohmaraie M

机构信息

Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 1999 Apr;77(4):882-8. doi: 10.2527/1999.774882x.

DOI:10.2527/1999.774882x
PMID:10328352
Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to determine the impact of USDA quality grade on the palatability of "tender" longissimus when cooked well done. Warner-Bratzler shear force was determined on longissimus thoracis steaks aged 3 or 14 d postmortem (cooked to 70 degrees C) from carcasses of 692 steers and heifers. Steaks from 31 carcasses with Modest or Moderate marbling scores (Top Choice) and steaks from 31 carcasses with Slight00 to Slight40 marbling scores (Low Select) were selected for this experiment from carcasses identified as "tender" (shear force < 5.0 kg at 3 d postmortem). Longissimus thoracis steaks with 3 or 14 d of postmortem aging were cooked to 80 degrees C and evaluated by a trained sensory descriptive attribute panel. Top Choice steaks had higher (P < .05) juiciness (5.8 vs 5.3) and beef flavor intensity ratings (4.9 vs 4.6) than Low Select steaks. Aging of steaks for 14, rather than 3, d postmortem improved (P < .05) beef flavor intensity rating (4.8 vs 4.7) but not (P > .05) juiciness rating (5.6 vs 5.5). The interaction (P < .05) of quality grade and aging time for tenderness rating indicated that Top Choice steaks were more tender (P < .05) with 3 d of aging than steaks from Low Select carcasses (6.3 vs 5.8), but steaks from Top Choice and Low Select carcasses had similar (P > .05) tenderness ratings after 14 d of aging (7.0 and 6.8). Compared to palatability of steaks from Low Select carcasses, the palatability of steaks from Top Choice carcasses was less affected by elevated degree of doneness in "tender" longissimus thoracis, especially when steaks were aged for only 3 d. Although differences in sensory traits between Top Choice and Low Select steaks were small, the consumers who cook beef well done may benefit from implementation of tenderness classification in conjunction with USDA quality grade.

摘要

本实验的目的是确定美国农业部质量等级对“嫩”背最长肌在全熟烹饪时适口性的影响。对692头公牛和母牛胴体的胸段背最长肌牛排进行了沃纳-布拉茨勒剪切力测定,这些牛排宰后成熟3天或14天(烹饪至70摄氏度)。从被鉴定为“嫩”(宰后3天剪切力<5.0千克)的胴体中,挑选出31头大理石花纹评分中等或适中(特选级)的胴体上的牛排,以及31头大理石花纹评分轻微00至轻微40(低选级)的胴体上的牛排用于本实验。将宰后成熟3天或14天的胸段背最长肌牛排烹饪至80摄氏度,并由经过训练的感官描述属性评定小组进行评估。特选级牛排的多汁性评分(5.8对5.3)和牛肉风味强度评分(4.9对4.6)高于低选级牛排(P<.05)。牛排宰后成熟14天而非3天,牛肉风味强度评分有所提高(P<.05)(4.8对4.7),但多汁性评分没有提高(P>.05)(5.6对5.5)。嫩度评分的质量等级和成熟时间的交互作用(P<.05)表明,特选级牛排成熟3天时比低选级胴体上的牛排更嫩(P<.05)(6.3对5.8),但特选级和低选级胴体上的牛排成熟14天后嫩度评分相似(P>.05)(7.0和6.8)。与低选级胴体上的牛排适口性相比,特选级胴体上的牛排适口性受“嫩”胸段背最长肌熟度升高的影响较小,尤其是牛排仅成熟3天时。尽管特选级和低选级牛排的感官特性差异较小,但将嫩度分级与美国农业部质量等级结合实施,可能会使喜欢将牛肉全熟烹饪的消费者受益。

相似文献

1
Tenderness classification of beef: IV. Effect of USDA quality grade on the palatability of "tender" beef longissimus when cooked well done.牛肉的嫩度分级:IV. 美国农业部质量等级对“嫩”牛肉里脊在全熟烹饪时适口性的影响。
J Anim Sci. 1999 Apr;77(4):882-8. doi: 10.2527/1999.774882x.
2
Beef customer satisfaction: trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values.牛肉客户满意度:训练有素的感官评定小组评分和沃纳-布拉茨勒剪切力值。
J Anim Sci. 2003 Jan;81(1):143-9. doi: 10.2527/2003.811143x.
3
Tenderness classification of beef: III. Effect of the interaction between end point temperature and tenderness on Warner-Bratzler shear force of beef longissimus.牛肉嫩度分级:III. 终点温度与嫩度之间的相互作用对牛肉背最长肌Warner-Bratzler剪切力的影响。
J Anim Sci. 1999 Feb;77(2):400-7. doi: 10.2527/1999.772400x.
4
Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VI): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits.牛的生物学类型特征(第六轮):胴体、产量及背最长肌适口性性状
J Anim Sci. 2004 Apr;82(4):1177-89. doi: 10.2527/2004.8241177x.
5
Effectiveness of USDA instrument-based marbling measurements for categorizing beef carcasses according to differences in longissimus muscle sensory attributes.美国农业部基于仪器的大理石花纹测量在根据长肌感官特性的差异对牛肉胴体进行分类方面的有效性。
J Anim Sci. 2013 Feb;91(2):1024-34. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5514. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
6
Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks.牛肉顾客满意度:美国农业部质量等级及腌制对消费者对牛外脊牛排评价的影响
J Anim Sci. 2005 Mar;83(3):662-70. doi: 10.2527/2005.833662x.
7
Effect of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride to beef and calf-fed Holstein cattle on consumer palatability ratings.盐酸齐帕特罗对育肥牛和荷斯坦犊牛的适口性影响。
J Anim Sci. 2009 Nov;87(11):3712-21. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-1837. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
8
Comparison of tenderness, palatability, and retail caselife of enhanced cow subprimals with nonenhanced cow and United States Department of Agriculture Select subprimals.强化处理的牛分割肉与未强化处理的牛分割肉以及美国农业部精选级分割肉在嫩度、适口性和零售货架期方面的比较。
J Anim Sci. 2010 Nov;88(11):3683-92. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2581. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
9
Characterization of certified Angus beef steaks from the round, loin, and chuck.来自牛后腿肉、腰部和肩胛肉的认证安格斯牛排的特性分析。
J Anim Sci. 2004 May;82(5):1437-44. doi: 10.2527/2004.8251437x.
10
Characterization of estrogen-trenbolone acetate implants on tenderness and consumer acceptability of beef under the effect of 2 aging times.在 2 种不同熟成时间的影响下,雌二醇-群勃龙醋酸酯植入物对牛肉嫩度和消费者可接受性的特征分析。
J Anim Sci. 2011 Mar;89(3):792-7. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3115.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of marbling and enhancement's abilities to compensate for reduced beef palatability at elevated degrees of doneness.评价大理石花纹和嫩度增强对提高牛肉烹饪至较高熟度时适口性的补偿能力。
J Anim Sci. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):669-686. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky435.
2
Muscle transcriptomic analyses in Angus cattle with divergent tenderness.具有不同嫩度特性的安格斯牛肌肉转录组分析。
Mol Biol Rep. 2012 Apr;39(4):4185-93. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-1203-6. Epub 2011 Sep 7.