Conrozier T, Bochu M, Gratacos J, Piperno M, Mathieu P, Vignon E
Service de rhumatologie, Centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 May;7(3):295-300. doi: 10.1053/joca.1998.0203.
To compare the value of Lequesne's false profile (LFP) radiograph of the hip and antero-posterior (AP) X-ray of the pelvis in the assessment of joint space narrowing (JSN) and osteophyte (Ost) in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA).
AP and LFP radiographs of the hip were performed using a standardized method in 50 consecutive patients with hip OA. JSN and Ost were graded at different days by a single observer blinded for patients identity, using a six point scale (JSN:0-5) and a four point scale (Ost:0-3) from AP and LFP respectively. Scores obtained from AP and LFP were compared.
Mean JSN grade was significantly higher for LFP (2. 7+/-1.0) than AP (2.4+/-1.2) (P=0.001). It was identical for AP and LFP in 28 patients (56%) while the highest grade was found on LFP in 16 (32%) and on AP in 6 (12%). No significant difference between LFP and AP was found for osteophyte grading.
These data suggest that the combination AP+LFP provide more information than AP alone for the evaluation of joint space narrowing in about one third of patients. LFP may be helpful for the radiographic assessment of OA changes particularly in structure modifying drugs evaluation.
比较髋关节Lequesne假轮廓(LFP)X线片和骨盆前后位(AP)X线片在评估髋骨关节炎(OA)患者关节间隙狭窄(JSN)和骨赘(Ost)方面的价值。
采用标准化方法对50例连续的髋OA患者进行髋关节AP和LFP X线检查。由一名对患者身份不知情的观察者在不同日期分别使用六点量表(JSN:0 - 5)和四点量表(Ost:0 - 3)对AP和LFP的JSN和Ost进行分级。比较AP和LFP获得的评分。
LFP的平均JSN分级(2.7±1.0)显著高于AP(2.4±1.2)(P = 0.001)。28例患者(56%)的AP和LFP分级相同,16例(32%)患者LFP分级最高,6例(12%)患者AP分级最高。骨赘分级在LFP和AP之间未发现显著差异。
这些数据表明,对于约三分之一的患者,AP + LFP组合比单独使用AP在评估关节间隙狭窄方面提供了更多信息。LFP可能有助于OA变化的影像学评估,特别是在结构改变药物评估方面。