Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚麻醉

Propofol anesthesia.

作者信息

Short C E, Bufalari A

机构信息

College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

出版信息

Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1999 May;29(3):747-78. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(99)50059-4.

Abstract

Although questions may still remain regarding the use of this unique sedative-hypnotic drug with anesthetic properties in high-risk patients, our studies have provided cardiopulmonary and neurological evidence of the efficacy and safety of propofol when used as an anesthetic under normal and selected impaired conditions in the dog. 1. Propofol can be safely and effectively used for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in normal healthy dogs. Propofol is also a reliable and safe anesthetic agent when used during induced cardiovascular and pulmonary-impaired conditions without surgery. The propofol requirements to induce the safe and prompt induction of anesthesia prior to inhalant anesthesia with and without surgery have been determined. 2. The favorable recovery profile associated with propofol offers advantages over traditional anesthetics in clinical situations in which rapid recovery is important. Also, propofol compatibility with a large variety of preanesthetics may increase its use as a safe and reliable i.v. anesthetic for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia and sedation in small animal veterinary practice. Although propofol has proven to be a valuable adjuvant during short ambulatory procedures, its use for the maintenance of general anesthesia has been questioned for surgery lasting more than 1 hour because of increased cost and marginal differences in recovery times compared with those of standard inhalant or balanced anesthetic techniques. When propofol is used for the maintenance of anesthesia in combination with a sedative/analgesic, the quality of anesthesia is improved as well as the ease with which the practitioner can titrate propofol; therefore, practitioners are able to use i.v. anesthetic techniques more effectively in their clinical practices. 3. Propofol can induce significant depression of respiratory function, characterized by a reduction in the rate of respiration. Potent alpha 2 sedative/analgesics (e.g., xylazine, medetomidine) or opioids (e.g., oxymorphone, butorphanol) increase the probability of respiratory depression during anesthesia. Appropriate consideration of dose reduction and speed of administration of propofol reduces the degree of depression. Cardiovascular changes induced by propofol administration consist of a slight decrease in arterial blood pressures (systolic, mean, diastolic) without a compensatory increase in heart rate. Selective premedicants markedly modify this characteristic response. 4. When coupled with subjective responses to painful stimuli, EEG responses during propofol anesthesia provide clear evidence that satisfactory anesthesia has been achieved in experimental dogs. When propofol is used as the only anesthetic agent, a higher dose is required to induce an equipotent level of CNS depression compared with the situation when dogs are premedicated. 5. The propofol induction dose requirement should be appropriately decreased by 20% to 80% when propofol is administered in combination with sedative or analgesic agents as part of a balanced technique as well as in elderly and debilitated patients. As a general recommendation, the dose of propofol should always be carefully titrated against the needs and responses of the individual patient, as there is considerable variability in anesthetic requirements among patients. Because propofol does not have marked analgesic effects and its metabolism is rapid, the use of local anesthetics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and opioids to provide postoperative analgesia improves the quality of recovery after propofol anesthesia. 6. The cardiovascular depressant effects of propofol are well tolerated in healthy animals, but these effects may be more problematic in high-risk patients with intrinsic cardiac disease as well as in those with systemic disease. In hypovolemic patients and those with limited cardiac reserve, even small induction doses of propofol (0.75-1.5 mg/kg i.v.) can produce profound hypotens

摘要

尽管对于在高危患者中使用这种具有麻醉特性的独特镇静催眠药物仍可能存在疑问,但我们的研究已提供了心肺和神经方面的证据,证明丙泊酚在正常及特定受损条件下用于犬麻醉时的有效性和安全性。1. 丙泊酚可安全有效地用于正常健康犬的麻醉诱导和维持。在诱导性心血管和肺部受损但无手术的情况下使用时,丙泊酚也是一种可靠且安全的麻醉剂。已确定在有手术和无手术的情况下,在吸入麻醉前诱导安全且迅速麻醉所需的丙泊酚剂量。2. 与丙泊酚相关的良好恢复特征在快速恢复很重要的临床情况下比传统麻醉剂具有优势。此外,丙泊酚与多种麻醉前用药的相容性可能会增加其作为一种安全可靠的静脉麻醉剂在小动物兽医实践中用于全身麻醉诱导和维持以及镇静的应用。尽管丙泊酚已被证明在短时间非住院手术中是一种有价值的辅助药物,但由于成本增加以及与标准吸入或平衡麻醉技术相比恢复时间的微小差异,其用于持续超过1小时手术的全身麻醉维持一直受到质疑。当丙泊酚与镇静/镇痛药联合用于麻醉维持时,麻醉质量得到改善,并且从业者滴定丙泊酚也更容易;因此,从业者能够在其临床实践中更有效地使用静脉麻醉技术。3. 丙泊酚可引起呼吸功能的显著抑制,表现为呼吸频率降低。强效α2镇静/镇痛药(如赛拉嗪、美托咪定)或阿片类药物(如羟吗啡酮、布托啡诺)会增加麻醉期间呼吸抑制的可能性。适当考虑减少丙泊酚的剂量和给药速度可降低抑制程度。丙泊酚给药引起的心血管变化包括动脉血压(收缩压、平均压、舒张压)略有下降,而心率无代偿性增加。选择性麻醉前用药会显著改变这种特征性反应。4. 当与对疼痛刺激的主观反应相结合时,丙泊酚麻醉期间的脑电图反应提供了明确证据,表明实验犬已实现满意的麻醉。当丙泊酚用作唯一麻醉剂时,与犬预先用药的情况相比,需要更高的剂量才能诱导出等效的中枢神经系统抑制水平。5. 当丙泊酚与镇静或镇痛剂联合作为平衡技术的一部分给药时,以及在老年和体弱患者中,丙泊酚的诱导剂量要求应适当降低20%至80%。作为一般建议,丙泊酚的剂量应始终根据个体患者的需求和反应仔细滴定,因为患者之间的麻醉需求存在相当大的差异。由于丙泊酚没有明显的镇痛作用且其代谢迅速,使用局部麻醉剂、非甾体抗炎药和阿片类药物提供术后镇痛可提高丙泊酚麻醉后的恢复质量。6. 丙泊酚的心血管抑制作用在健康动物中耐受性良好,但在患有原发性心脏病的高危患者以及患有全身性疾病的患者中,这些作用可能更成问题。在低血容量患者和心脏储备有限的患者中,即使是小剂量的丙泊酚诱导剂量(静脉注射0.75 - 1.5 mg/kg)也可导致严重低血压。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验