• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血压控制不佳的重度高血压患者的临床表现与管理:一家公立教学医院的研究结果

Clinical presentation and management of patients with uncontrolled, severe hypertension: results from a public teaching hospital.

作者信息

Preston R A, Baltodano N M, Cienki J, Materson B J

机构信息

Clinical Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, FL 33136, USA.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Apr;13(4):249-55. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000796.

DOI:10.1038/sj.jhh.1000796
PMID:10333343
Abstract

CONTEXT

There is relatively little data available on the management of patients with severe, uncomplicated hypertension and severe hypertension with stable hypertensive complications.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence, clinical features, acute management, and clinical course of severe, uncomplicated hypertension and severe hypertension with stable hypertensive complications presenting for emergency department care in a large public teaching hospital.

DESIGN

Chart survey of consecutive emergency department visits.

PATIENTS

Ninety-one of 2898 consecutive visits to a public teaching hospital emergency department were specifically for severe, uncomplicated hypertension.

RESULTS

Of 2898 consecutive medical emergency department visits, there were 142 (4.9%) patient visits specifically for systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or =220 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or =120 mm Hg. Ninety-one of the 142 patient visits were for severe hypertension in the absence of acute target organ impact or neuroretinopathy. Eighty-nine patients received acute drug therapy. Twenty-nine patients received two drugs, and 15 received three drugs. Sixty-eight patients (75%) received clonidine, and 15 (16.5%) received short-acting nifedipine despite widely published concerns about the safety of this practice. We found a wide variability of blood pressure response to treatment. The average decline in SBP was 50+/-31 mm Hg and the average decline of DBP was 34+/-20 mm Hg over 4.2+/-2.9 h. Forty-two patients (46%) had the SBP reduced to less than 160 mm Hg, and 46 patients (50%) the DBP to less than 100 mm Hg. Long-term management and follow-up were suboptimal. Of 74 patients discharged from the emergency room, 22 patients (30%) returned because of uncontrolled hypertension within an average of 33+/-28 days, 10 patients with hypertensive complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe hypertension continues to present an important and common problem. Physicians appear to place a strong emphasis on acute lowering of the blood pressure to near-normal levels. Patients are frequently lost to follow-up and have a very high rate of recurrent emergency department visits and hypertensive complications. This study points to a need for detailed, specific practice guidelines and comprehensive disease management protocols for severe, uncomplicated hypertension.

摘要

背景

关于重度单纯性高血压患者以及伴有稳定高血压并发症的重度高血压患者的管理,现有数据相对较少。

目的

确定在一家大型公立教学医院急诊科就诊的重度单纯性高血压以及伴有稳定高血压并发症的重度高血压的发病率、临床特征、急性处理措施及临床病程。

设计

对连续的急诊科就诊病例进行图表调查。

患者

在一家公立教学医院急诊科的2898次连续就诊中,有91次是专门针对重度单纯性高血压的。

结果

在2898次连续的医疗急诊科就诊中,有142例(4.9%)患者就诊是专门针对收缩压(SBP)≥220 mmHg或舒张压(DBP)≥120 mmHg。这142例患者就诊中有91次是因重度高血压且无急性靶器官损害或视网膜病变。89例患者接受了急性药物治疗。29例患者使用了两种药物,15例使用了三种药物。68例患者(75%)接受了可乐定治疗,15例(16.5%)接受了短效硝苯地平治疗,尽管这种做法的安全性已被广泛报道。我们发现血压对治疗的反应差异很大。在4.2±2.9小时内,SBP平均下降50±31 mmHg,DBP平均下降34±20 mmHg。42例患者(46%)的SBP降至160 mmHg以下,46例患者(50%)的DBP降至100 mmHg以下。长期管理和随访情况欠佳。在74例从急诊室出院的患者中,22例患者(30%)因高血压未得到控制在平均33±28天内复诊,其中10例伴有高血压并发症。

结论

重度高血压仍然是一个重要且常见的问题。医生似乎非常强调将血压急性降至接近正常水平。患者经常失去随访,急诊复诊率和高血压并发症发生率非常高。本研究表明,对于重度单纯性高血压,需要详细、具体的实践指南和全面的疾病管理方案。

相似文献

1
Clinical presentation and management of patients with uncontrolled, severe hypertension: results from a public teaching hospital.血压控制不佳的重度高血压患者的临床表现与管理:一家公立教学医院的研究结果
J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Apr;13(4):249-55. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000796.
2
Long-acting lacidipine versus short-acting nifedipine in the treatment of asymptomatic acute blood pressure increase.长效拉西地平与短效硝苯地平治疗无症状性急性血压升高的比较
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999 Mar;33(3):479-84. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199903000-00019.
3
Effect of enalapril and nifedipine on orthostatic hypotension in older hypertensive patients.依那普利和硝苯地平对老年高血压患者直立性低血压的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Jul;48(7):807-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04757.x.
4
Evaluation of drug therapy for treatment of hypertensive urgencies in the emergency department.
Am J Emerg Med. 1991 Mar;9(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(91)90168-j.
5
Efficacy of different antihypertensive drugs in the emergency department.不同降压药物在急诊科的疗效
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Sep;10 Suppl 3:S143-6.
6
Outcomes of minority patients with very severe hypertension (>220/>120 mmHg).少数民族患者中非常严重的高血压(>220/>120mmHg)的结局。
J Hypertens. 2019 Feb;37(2):415-425. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001906.
7
Effectiveness of combination therapy with nifedipine GITS: a prospective, 12-week observational study (AdADOSE).硝苯地平控释片联合治疗的有效性:一项为期12周的前瞻性观察研究(AdADOSE)。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 May 9;15:35. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0037-x.
8
Anti-hypertensive dose-response effects of nicardipine in stable essential hypertension.尼卡地平在稳定型原发性高血压中的降压剂量-反应效应。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1985;20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):135S-138S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1985.tb05156.x.
9
Cigarette Smoking and Subtypes of Uncontrolled Blood Pressure Among Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients: Paradoxical Associations and Implications.已确诊高血压患者中的吸烟与血压失控亚型:矛盾关联及影响
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Jun 1;30(6):602-609. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx014.
10
A study of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide vs nifedipine GITS in elderly patients with diastolic hypertension.一项关于氯沙坦单独使用或与氢氯噻嗪联用对比硝苯地平控释片治疗老年舒张期高血压患者的研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1998 Oct;12(10):693-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000687.

引用本文的文献

1
What is urgent about hypertensive urgency?高血压急症的紧急情况是什么?
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Jul;63(7):543.
2
Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage after Emergency Department Discharges for Hypertension.高血压患者急诊科出院后发生脑出血的风险
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jul;25(7):1683-1687. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.03.046. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
3
LCZ696, a First-in-Class Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor: The First Clinical Experience in Patients With Severe Hypertension.LCZ696,一种首创的血管紧张素受体-中性肽链内切酶抑制剂:重度高血压患者的首次临床经验。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Apr;18(4):308-14. doi: 10.1111/jch.12667. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
4
Playing a role in secondary prevention in the ED: longitudinal study of patients with asymptomatic elevated blood pressures following a brief education intervention: a pilot study.在急诊科二级预防中发挥作用:对经过简短教育干预后无症状血压升高患者的纵向研究:一项试点研究。
Public Health. 2015 May;129(5):604-6. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
5
The management of severe hypertension in Australian general practice.澳大利亚全科医学中重度高血压的管理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 14;13:414. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-414.
6
Oral drugs for hypertensive urgencies: systematic review and meta-analysis.用于高血压急症的口服药物:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2009 Nov;127(6):366-72. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802009000600009.
7
The risks and benefits of initial irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with severe hypertension.初始厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪联合治疗重度高血压患者的风险与获益
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2009 May;11(5):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00109.x.
8
The epidemiology and management of severe hypertension.严重高血压的流行病学和管理。
J Hum Hypertens. 2010 Jan;24(1):9-18. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2009.37.
9
Emerging insights in the first-step use of antihypertensive combination therapy.抗高血压联合治疗初始应用的新见解
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 Dec;9(12 Suppl 5):5-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.07807.x.
10
BP goal achievement in patients with uncontrolled hypertension : results of the treat-to-target post-marketing survey with irbesartan.血压控制不佳的高血压患者实现血压目标情况:厄贝沙坦上市后治疗达标调查结果
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(11):783-96. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727110-00005.