Suppr超能文献

侧翼干扰回忆和侧翼干扰有效性效应可能反映了不同的注意过程。

Flanker recall and the flanker validity effect may reflect different attentional processes.

作者信息

Schmidt P A, Dark V J

机构信息

Iowa State University, Ames, USA.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 1999 Apr;61(3):424-37. doi: 10.3758/bf03211963.

Abstract

High flanker recall in the correlated flanker task suggests a failure of selective attention. We used a dissociation approach to examine the role of attentional processing of the flankers' identities in the flanker validity effect (FVE). In three experiments, flanker recall decreased as flanker duration decreased, but the FVE was not affected by flanker duration. Masking also produced a dissociation, in that masking decreased flanker recall but the FVE was not affected. Examination of on-line flanker identification suggested that flanker recall was an adequate measure of attentional processing of the flankers' identities on most trials. The results suggest that attentional processing of the flankers' identities is not related to the magnitude of the FVE and is not necessary for it to obtain. Because there is a failure of selective attention, the dissociations suggest that flanker recall and the FVE may reflect different attentional processes.

摘要

在关联侧翼任务中较高的侧翼刺激回忆表明选择性注意存在缺陷。我们采用了一种分离方法来检验侧翼刺激身份的注意加工在侧翼刺激有效性效应(FVE)中的作用。在三个实验中,侧翼刺激回忆随着侧翼刺激持续时间的缩短而减少,但FVE不受侧翼刺激持续时间的影响。掩蔽也产生了一种分离,即掩蔽降低了侧翼刺激回忆,但FVE不受影响。对在线侧翼刺激识别的检查表明,在大多数试验中,侧翼刺激回忆是对侧翼刺激身份注意加工的一种充分测量。结果表明,侧翼刺激身份的注意加工与FVE的大小无关,且对于获得FVE并非必要条件。由于存在选择性注意缺陷,这些分离表明侧翼刺激回忆和FVE可能反映了不同的注意过程。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验