Suppr超能文献

氯替泼诺醇乙酯与醋酸泼尼松龙治疗急性前葡萄膜炎的对照评估。氯替泼诺醇乙酯美国葡萄膜炎研究组。

Controlled evaluation of loteprednol etabonate and prednisolone acetate in the treatment of acute anterior uveitis. Loteprednol Etabonate US Uveitis Study Group.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 May;127(5):537-44. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00034-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of loteprednol etabonate 0.5% ophthalmic suspension with prednisolone acetate 1.0% ophthalmic suspension in reducing the ocular signs and symptoms associated with acute anterior uveitis.

METHODS

Two prospective studies were conducted in sequence. Both were parallel, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled comparisons conducted at academic or private practice clinics in the United States. Efficacy was evaluated by the proportion of patients with a score of 0 for key signs and symptoms of uveitis. Intraocular pressure was increased regularly. The first study involved up to 42 days of treatment, starting with a dose of eight times per day. The second study involved up to 28 days of treatment, starting with a dose of 16 times per day.

RESULTS

In the first study (N = 70), the proportion of patients achieving resolution by the final visit was anterior chamber cell (74% loteprednol etabonate, 88% prednisolone acetate, P = .194) and flare (71% loteprednol etabonate, 81% prednisolone acetate, P = .330). In the second study (N = 175), the proportion of patients achieving resolution by the final visit was anterior chamber cell (72% loteprednol etabonate, 87% prednisolone acetate, P = .015) and flare (66% loteprednol etabonate, 82% prednisolone acetate, P = .017). In both studies, intraocular pressure increase of more than 10 mm Hg was observed more frequently in patients receiving prednisolone acetate (seven patients) than those receiving loteprednol etabonate (one patient).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a clinically meaningful reduction of signs and symptoms was noted in both treatment groups, loteprednol etabonate was less effective than prednisolone acetate in both of these controlled studies. However, the more favorable profile of loteprednol etabonate with respect to intraocular pressure increase may make it useful in many patients.

摘要

目的

比较0.5%氯替泼诺醇眼用混悬液与1.0%醋酸泼尼松龙眼用混悬液在减轻急性前葡萄膜炎相关眼部体征和症状方面的安全性和有效性。

方法

依次进行了两项前瞻性研究。两项研究均为平行、随机、双盲、活性对照比较,在美国的学术或私人诊所进行。通过葡萄膜炎关键体征和症状评分为0的患者比例来评估疗效。定期测量眼压。第一项研究涉及长达42天的治疗,起始剂量为每天8次。第二项研究涉及长达28天的治疗,起始剂量为每天16次。

结果

在第一项研究(N = 70)中,末次访视时达到症状缓解的患者比例,前房细胞方面(氯替泼诺醇74%,醋酸泼尼松龙88%,P = 0.194),闪光方面(氯替泼诺醇71%,醋酸泼尼松龙81%,P = 0.330)。在第二项研究(N = 175)中,末次访视时达到症状缓解的患者比例,前房细胞方面(氯替泼诺醇72%,醋酸泼尼松龙87%,P = 0.015),闪光方面(氯替泼诺醇66%,醋酸泼尼松龙82%,P = 0.017)。在两项研究中,接受醋酸泼尼松龙的患者(7例)比接受氯替泼诺醇的患者(1例)更频繁地出现眼压升高超过10 mmHg的情况。

结论

尽管两个治疗组的体征和症状均有临床意义的减轻,但在这两项对照研究中,氯替泼诺醇的疗效均低于醋酸泼尼松龙。然而,氯替泼诺醇在眼压升高方面更有利的表现可能使其对许多患者有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验