Suppr超能文献

通过免疫组织化学检测雌激素受体状态在预测乳腺癌辅助内分泌治疗反应方面优于配体结合测定法。

Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

作者信息

Harvey J M, Clark G M, Osborne C K, Allred D C

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1999 May;17(5):1474-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1474.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a newer technique for assessing the estrogen receptor (ER) status of breast cancers, with the potential to overcome many of the shortcomings associated with the traditional ligand-binding assay (LBA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of ER status determination by IHC, compared with LBA, to predict clinical outcome-especially response to adjuvant endocrine therapy-in a large number of patients with long-term clinical follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ER status was evaluated in 1,982 primary breast cancers by IHC on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections, using antibody 6F11 and standard methodology. Slides were scored on a scale representing the estimated proportion and intensity of positive-staining tumor cells (range, 0 to 8). Results were compared with ER values obtained by the LBA in the same tumors and to clinical outcome.

RESULTS

An IHC score of greater than 2 (corresponding to as few as 1% to 10% weakly positive cells) was used to define ER positivity on the basis of a univariate cut-point analysis of all possible scores and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients receiving any adjuvant endocrine therapy. Using this definition, 71% of all tumors were determined to be ER-positive by IHC, and the level of agreement with the LBA was 86%. In multivariate analyses of patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy alone, ER status determined by IHC was better than that determined by the LBA at predicting improved DFS (hazard ratios/P = 0.474/.0008 and 0.707/.3214, respectively) and equivalent at predicting overall survival (0.379/.0001 and 0.381/.0003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

IHC is superior to the LBA for assessing ER status in primary breast cancer because it is easier, safer, and less expensive, and has an equivalent or better ability to predict response to adjuvant endocrine therapy.

摘要

目的

免疫组织化学(IHC)是一种评估乳腺癌雌激素受体(ER)状态的新技术,有可能克服许多与传统配体结合分析(LBA)相关的缺点。本研究的目的是评估通过IHC确定ER状态与LBA相比,在大量长期临床随访患者中预测临床结局(尤其是辅助内分泌治疗反应)的能力。

患者和方法

使用抗体6F11和标准方法,通过对福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织切片进行IHC,对1982例原发性乳腺癌的ER状态进行评估。玻片根据代表阳性染色肿瘤细胞的估计比例和强度进行评分(范围为0至8)。将结果与同一肿瘤中通过LBA获得的ER值以及临床结局进行比较。

结果

基于对接受任何辅助内分泌治疗患者的所有可能评分和无病生存期(DFS)的单变量切点分析,IHC评分大于2(对应于低至1%至10%弱阳性细胞)被用于定义ER阳性。使用该定义,通过IHC确定所有肿瘤中有71%为ER阳性,与LBA的一致性水平为86%。在仅接受辅助内分泌治疗患者的多变量分析中,通过IHC确定的ER状态在预测改善的DFS方面优于通过LBA确定的ER状态(风险比/P分别为0.474/.0008和0.707/.3214),在预测总生存期方面相当(分别为0.379/.0001和0.381/.0003)。

结论

在评估原发性乳腺癌的ER状态方面,IHC优于LBA,因为它更简便、安全且成本更低,并且在预测辅助内分泌治疗反应方面具有同等或更好的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验