Burden R J, Shann F, Butt W, Ditchfield M
Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Thorax. 1999 Jun;54(6):511-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.6.511.
Severe tracheobronchial malacia and stenosis are important causes of morbidity and mortality in children in intensive care, but little is known about how best to diagnose these conditions or determine their prognosis.
The records of all 62 children in whom one or both of these conditions had been diagnosed by contrast cinetracheobronchography in our intensive care unit in the period 1986-95 were studied.
Seventy four per cent of the 62 children had congenital heart disease; none was a preterm baby with airways disease associated with prolonged ventilation. Fifteen of the children had airway stenosis without malacia; three died because of the stenosis and two died from other causes. Twenty eight of the 47 children with malacia died; only eight children survived without developmental or respiratory handicap. All children needing ventilation for malacia for longer than 14 consecutive days died if their bronchogram showed moderate or severe malacia of either main bronchus (15 cases), or malacia of any severity of both bronchi (three additional cases); all children needing ventilation for malacia for longer than 21 consecutive days died if their bronchogram showed malacia of any severity of the trachea or a main bronchus (three additional cases). These findings were strongly associated with a fatal outcome (p<0.00005); they were present in 21 children (all of whom died) and absent in 26 (of whom seven died, six from non-respiratory causes). They had a positive predictive value for death of 100%, but the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was 83.9% so up to 16% of patients meeting the criteria might survive.
In this series the findings on contrast cinetracheobronchography combined with the duration of ventilation provided a useful guide to the prognosis of children with tracheobronchomalacia. The information provided by bronchoscopy was less useful.
严重气管支气管软化和狭窄是重症监护患儿发病和死亡的重要原因,但对于如何最佳诊断这些病症或确定其预后知之甚少。
研究了1986年至1995年期间在我们重症监护病房通过对比动态气管支气管造影诊断出患有其中一种或两种病症的所有62名儿童的记录。
62名儿童中有74%患有先天性心脏病;没有一个是患有与长时间通气相关的气道疾病的早产儿。15名儿童有气道狭窄但无软化;3名因狭窄死亡,2名死于其他原因。47名患有软化的儿童中有28名死亡;只有8名儿童存活且无发育或呼吸障碍。如果支气管造影显示任一主支气管中度或重度软化(15例),或双侧支气管任何程度的软化(另外3例),所有因软化需要通气超过连续14天的儿童均死亡;如果支气管造影显示气管或主支气管任何程度的软化(另外3例),所有因软化需要通气超过连续21天的儿童均死亡。这些发现与致命结局密切相关(p<0.00005);21名儿童存在这些情况(全部死亡),26名儿童不存在(其中7名死亡,6名死于非呼吸原因)。它们对死亡的阳性预测值为100%,但95%置信区间的下限为83.9%,因此符合标准的患者中高达16%可能存活。
在本系列研究中,对比动态气管支气管造影的结果结合通气时间为气管支气管软化患儿的预后提供了有用的指导。支气管镜检查提供的信息作用较小。