Cortés V, Donoso M V, Brown N, Fanjul R, López C, Fournier A, Huidobro-Toro J P
Unidad de Regulación Neurohumoral, Departamento de Ciencias Fisiológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, P. Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 Jun;289(3):1313-22.
Although abundant literature supports the notion that neuropeptide Y (NPY) synergizes in vivo and in vitro, the vasomotor activity elicited by norepinephrine (NE), the converse interaction (i.e., the adrenergic modulation of the NPY vasomotor response) has been less characterized. To assess whether NE synergizes the vasomotor effect of NPY, the rat arterial mesenteric bed was chosen as a model experimental system. Mesenteries were precontracted with NE and few minutes later were perfused with exogenous NPY. Under these conditions, NPY contracted the arterial mesenteric bed with an EC50 value of 0.72 +/- 0.06 nM. NPY was unable to contract this vascular territory without an agonist-induced precontraction. Other agonists, such as endothelin-1, a synthetic analog of prostaglandin F2alpha, or 5-hydroxytryptamine, also were effective primers because in their presence, NPY was a potent vasoconstrictor. In contrast, mesenteries precontracted with KCl failed to evidence the NPY-induced rise in perfusion pressure. Two structural analogs of NPY, PYY and [Leu31, Pro34]NPY, mimicked the activity of NPY. The NPY fragment 13-36 did not elicit such a response. All NPY analogs exhibited less efficacy and potency relative to NPY. The NPY- and related structural analog-induced vasoconstriction was competitively and reversibly antagonized by BIBP 3226; the pA2 of the NPY interaction was 7.0. The application of 0.1 to 1 microM BIBP 3226 or 0.1 to 10 nM prazosin at the peak of the NPY vasomotor response elicited a gradual blockade of the vasoconstriction. Although BIBP 3226 blocked the increase in perfusion pressure elicited by NPY, leaving unaffected the NE-induced tone, 10 nM prazosin blocked the full response, including the NE-induced component. Tissue preincubation with 200 nM nifedipine abolished the NPY-induced vasoconstriction; likewise, the acute application of 10 to 100 nM nifedipine blocked gradually the maximal NPY-induced contraction. Removal of the mesenteric endothelial layer increased the potency of NPY by 2-fold; it also slightly potentiated the antagonist activity of BIBP 3226. The synergism between NPY and NE backs the principle of sympathetic cotransmission.
尽管大量文献支持神经肽Y(NPY)在体内和体外具有协同作用的观点,但去甲肾上腺素(NE)引发的血管舒缩活性以及相反的相互作用(即NPY血管舒缩反应的肾上腺素能调节)的特征却鲜为人知。为了评估NE是否增强NPY的血管舒缩作用,选用大鼠肠系膜动脉床作为实验模型系统。先用NE使肠系膜预收缩,几分钟后用外源性NPY灌注。在这些条件下,NPY使肠系膜动脉床收缩,其半数有效浓度(EC50)值为0.72±0.06 nM。若无激动剂诱导的预收缩,NPY无法使该血管区域收缩。其他激动剂,如内皮素-1、前列腺素F2α的合成类似物或5-羟色胺,也是有效的引发剂,因为在它们存在的情况下,NPY是一种有效的血管收缩剂。相反,用氯化钾预收缩的肠系膜未显示出NPY诱导的灌注压升高。NPY的两种结构类似物,肽YY(PYY)和[Leu31, Pro34]NPY,模拟了NPY的活性。NPY片段13 - 36未引发这种反应。所有NPY类似物相对于NPY均表现出较低的效能和效价。NPY及相关结构类似物诱导的血管收缩被BIBP 3226竞争性且可逆地拮抗;NPY相互作用的pA2为7.0。在NPY血管舒缩反应的峰值施加0.1至1 microM的BIBP 3226或0.1至10 nM的哌唑嗪会逐渐阻断血管收缩。尽管BIBP 3226阻断了NPY引起的灌注压升高,而不影响NE诱导的张力,但10 nM的哌唑嗪阻断了包括NE诱导成分在内的全部反应。用200 nM硝苯地平对组织进行预孵育消除了NPY诱导的血管收缩;同样,急性施加10至100 nM硝苯地平会逐渐阻断NPY诱导的最大收缩。去除肠系膜内皮会使NPY的效价提高2倍;它还略微增强了BIBP 3226的拮抗活性。NPY和NE之间的协同作用支持了交感神经共同传递的原理。