Suppr超能文献

用新型H1受体拮抗剂咪唑斯汀对健康志愿者进行的心脏复极化研究。

Study of cardiac repolarization in healthy volunteers performed with mizolastine, a new H1-receptor antagonist.

作者信息

Chaufour S, Caplain H, Lilienthal N, L'héritier C, Deschamps C, Dubruc C, Rosenzweig P

机构信息

Synthélabo Recherche, 31 Av. Paul-Vaillant Couturier, BP110, 92225 Bagneux, France.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 May;47(5):515-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00927.x.

Abstract

AIMS

The occurrence of serious dysrhythmias, such as torsades de pointes, with terfenadine and astemizole had led to a reexamination of the potential effect of H1 antihistamines on cardiac repolarization. Mizolastine is a potent, selective, nonsedating peripherally acting H1-receptor antagonist which is registered for rhinitis and urticaria at a recommended dose of 10 mg once daily. The present study was carried out to investigate the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of mizolastine, on ventricular repolarization in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy young volunteers participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised study with three parallel groups. Each group consisted of 2 way cross-over 7 day treatment periods where mizolastine (10, 20 or 40 mg) and placebo were randomly administered. On day 1 and day 7, 12-lead ECG recordings were performed prior and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 20 h after dosing and from day 2 to day 6, before dosing and 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after.

RESULTS

Whatever the analysis used (raw data, changes from baseline, incidence of individual out-of-range values) no significant differences were observed at any dose level vs placebo, on any of ECG parameters (HR, PR, QRS, QT, and QTc). In particular, no effect of mizolastine vs placebo was shown on QT and QTc although 95% CIs were wide. The only subject who exhibited a QTc>/=450 ms received placebo for 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no evidence of an effect of mizolastine up to 40 mg (four times the therapeutic dose) on ventricular repolarization in healthy volunteers.

摘要

目的

特非那定和阿司咪唑可引发严重心律失常,如尖端扭转型室速,这促使人们重新审视H1抗组胺药对心脏复极化的潜在影响。咪唑斯汀是一种强效、选择性、非镇静性的外周作用H1受体拮抗剂,以每日10 mg的推荐剂量用于治疗鼻炎和荨麻疹。本研究旨在调查治疗剂量和超治疗剂量的咪唑斯汀对健康志愿者心室复极化的影响。

方法

24名健康年轻志愿者参与了一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机分组的平行三组研究。每组包括两个为期7天的交叉治疗期,随机给予咪唑斯汀(10、20或40 mg)和安慰剂。在第1天和第7天,给药前以及给药后0.5、1、2、3、4、6、8、12、16和20小时进行12导联心电图记录;从第2天到第6天,给药前以及给药后1、2、3和4小时进行记录。

结果

无论采用何种分析方法(原始数据、相对于基线的变化、个体超出范围值的发生率),在任何剂量水平与安慰剂相比,任何心电图参数(心率、PR间期、QRS波群、QT间期和校正QT间期)均未观察到显著差异。特别是,尽管95%置信区间较宽,但咪唑斯汀与安慰剂相比对QT间期和校正QT间期没有影响。唯一QTc≥450 ms的受试者接受了7天的安慰剂治疗。

结论

本研究未发现高达40 mg(治疗剂量的四倍)的咪唑斯汀对健康志愿者心室复极化有影响的证据。

相似文献

1
Study of cardiac repolarization in healthy volunteers performed with mizolastine, a new H1-receptor antagonist.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 May;47(5):515-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00927.x.
2
QT interval monitoring during clinical studies with mizolastine, a new H1 antihistamine.
Clin Exp Allergy. 1999 Jul;29 Suppl 3:206-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.0290s3206.x.
7
Inhibition of histamine-induced skin wheal and flare after 5 days of mizolastine.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Jan;36(1):72-8. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04154.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular safety of antihistamines.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2014 Jun;31(3):182-6. doi: 10.5114/pdia.2014.43191. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
2
Cardiac repolarisation and drug regulation: assessing cardiac safety 10 years after the CPMP guidance.
Drug Saf. 2007;30(12):1093-110. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730120-00003.
3
Chronic urticaria: aetiology, management and current and future treatment options.
Drugs. 2004;64(22):2515-36. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464220-00003.
4
Comparative activity of cetirizine and mizolastine on histamine-induced skin wheal and flare responses at 24 h.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Mar;53(3):250-4. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01551.x.
5
Clinical pharmacokinetics of mizolastine.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001;40(7):501-7. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200140070-00002.
6
Inhibition of HERG1 K(+) channels by the novel second-generation antihistamine mizolastine.
Br J Pharmacol. 2000 Nov;131(6):1081-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703654.

本文引用的文献

1
Can an antihistamine delay appearance of hay fever symptoms when given prior to pollen season?
Allergy. 1997 Apr;52(4):440-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb01026.x.
2
Risks of non-sedating antihistamines.
Lancet. 1997 May 3;349(9061):1322. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)26018-6.
3
Inhibition of histamine-induced skin wheal and flare after 5 days of mizolastine.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Jan;36(1):72-8. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04154.x.
6
Efficacy and safety of mizolastine in seasonal allergic rhinitis. The Rhinase Study Group.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996 Feb;76(2):163-8. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63417-5.
8
The electrocardiographic effects of cetirizine in normal subjects.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994 Sep;56(3):295-301. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1994.140.
9
H1-receptor antagonists. Comparative tolerability and safety.
Drug Saf. 1994 May;10(5):350-80. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199410050-00002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验