Montironi R, Diamanti L, Santinelli A, Galetti-Prayer T, Zattoni F, Selvaggi F P, Pagano F, Bono A V
Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology, University of Ancona, School of Medicine, Regional Hospital, Italy.
Pathol Res Pract. 1999;195(4):201-8. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(99)80036-3.
The likelihood of finding organ-confined untreated prostate cancer (PCa) by pathological examination at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) is only 50% in patients with clinically organ-confined disease. In addition, tumour is present at the resection margin in approximately 30% of clinical T2 (clinical stage B) cases. The issue of clinical "understaging" and of resection limit positivity have led to the development of novel management practices, including "neoadjuvant" hormonal therapy (NHT). The optimal duration of NHT is unknown. We undertook the present analysis to evaluate the effect of NHT on pathologic stage of PCa and resection limit status in patients with prostate cancer and treated with total androgen ablation either for three or six months before RP. Between January 1996 and February 1998, 259 men with prostate cancer underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic node dissection in the 26 centres participating in the Italian randomised prospective PROSIT study. Whole mount sectioning of the complete RP specimens was adopted in each centre for accurately evaluating the pathologic stage and resection limit status. By February 1998, haematoxylin and eosin stained sections from 155 RP specimens had been received and evaluated by the reviewing pathologist (RM). 64 cases had not been treated with total androgen ablation (e.g. NHT) before RP was performed, whereas 58 and 33 had been treated for three and six months, respectively. 114 patients were clinical stage B whereas 41 were clinical stage C. After three months of total androgen ablation, pathological stage B was more prevalent among patients with clinical B tumours, compared with untreated patients (57% in treated patients vs. 36% in untreated). The percentage of cancers with negative margins was statistically significantly greater in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy than those treated with immediate surgery alone (69% vs. 42%, respectively). After six months of NHT therapy the proportion of patients with pathological stage B (67% vs. 36%, respectively) and negative margins was greater than after 3 months (92% vs. 42%, respectively). For clinical C tumours, the prevalence of pathological stage B and negative margins in the patients treated for either 3 or 6 months was not as high as in the clinical B tumours, when compared with the untreated group (pathological stage B: 31% and 33% vs. 6% in the clinical C cases, respectively. Negative margins: 56% and 67% vs. 31%, respectively). The initial results of this study suggest that total androgen ablation before RP is beneficial in men with clinical stage B because of the significant pathological downstaging and decrease in the number of positive margins in the RP specimens. These two effects are more pronounced after six months of NHT than after three months of therapy. The same degree of beneficial effects are not observed in clinical C tumours.
在临床诊断为器官局限性疾病的患者中,根治性前列腺切除术(RP)时通过病理检查发现器官局限性未经治疗的前列腺癌(PCa)的可能性仅为50%。此外,在大约30%的临床T2期(临床B期)病例中,肿瘤出现在手术切缘。临床“分期过低”和切缘阳性的问题促使了新的治疗方法的发展,包括“新辅助”激素治疗(NHT)。NHT的最佳持续时间尚不清楚。我们进行了本分析,以评估NHT对前列腺癌患者病理分期和切缘状态的影响,这些患者在RP前接受了三个月或六个月的全雄激素阻断治疗。1996年1月至1998年2月,259名前列腺癌男性在参与意大利随机前瞻性PROSIT研究的26个中心接受了根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术和双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术。每个中心采用完整RP标本的全切片检查来准确评估病理分期和切缘状态。到1998年2月,评审病理学家(RM)已接收并评估了155份RP标本的苏木精和伊红染色切片。64例患者在进行RP前未接受全雄激素阻断治疗(如NHT),而58例和33例分别接受了三个月和六个月的治疗。114例患者为临床B期,41例为临床C期。在进行三个月的全雄激素阻断治疗后,与未治疗的患者相比,临床B期肿瘤患者中病理B期更为普遍(治疗组为57%,未治疗组为36%)。新辅助治疗患者的切缘阴性癌百分比在统计学上显著高于单纯立即手术治疗的患者(分别为69%和42%)。在进行六个月的NHT治疗后,病理B期患者的比例(分别为67%和36%)和切缘阴性的比例高于三个月后(分别为92%和42%)。对于临床C期肿瘤,与未治疗组相比,接受三个月或六个月治疗的患者中病理B期和切缘阴性的发生率不如临床B期肿瘤高(病理B期:分别为31%和33%,临床C期病例为6%。切缘阴性:分别为56%和67%,未治疗组为31%)。本研究的初步结果表明,RP前的全雄激素阻断对临床B期男性有益,因为RP标本中的病理分期显著降低且阳性切缘数量减少。这两种效果在NHT六个月后比治疗三个月后更明显。在临床C期肿瘤中未观察到相同程度的有益效果。