Suppr超能文献

三胎妊娠的围产期结局:预防性宫颈环扎术有作用吗?

Perinatal outcome of triplet gestation: does prophylactic cerclage make a difference?

作者信息

Elimian A, Figueroa R, Nigam S, Verma U, Tejani N, Kirshenbaum N

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, USA.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Med. 1999 May-Jun;8(3):119-22. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199905/06)8:3<119::AID-MFM9>3.0.CO;2-O.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perinatal outcome of triplet gestations with and without prophylactic cerclage.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all triplet gestations delivered between January 1988 and June 1997 was performed. Only women initiating prenatal care before 15 weeks gestation were included. The cerclage group was compared to the no-cerclage group for maternal and perinatal outcome variables. Student t-test, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact test were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty of the 59 (33.8%) sets of triplet gestations had prophylactic cerclage. There were no differences between groups when compared for maternal age, parity, preterm labor rate, gestational diabetes, anemia, antenatal steroid use, histologic chorioamnionitis, and postoperative endometritis. In addition, there were no differences in mean birth weight, Apgar scores, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), intraventricular hemorrhage/periventricular leucomalacia (IVH/PVL), and neonatal mortality. Although the mean gestational age at delivery for the cerclage group (32.8+/-2.4 weeks) was not different from the no-cerclage group (31.5+/-3.6 weeks), the proportion of pregnancies delivered at 31 weeks or more, and at 32 weeks or more, was significantly higher in the cerclage group (90 vs. 62%, P = .02; 80 vs. 54%, P = .05), respectively. In addition, the incidence of extremely low birth weight (LBW) was significantly decreased in the cerclage compared with the no-cerclage group (1.7 vs. 15.4%, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic cerclage decreased significantly the incidence of extremely LBW neonates in triplet pregnancies. The proportion of neonates delivered at 31 weeks or more, and at 32 weeks or more was higher in the cerclage group.

摘要

目的

比较有预防性宫颈环扎术和无预防性宫颈环扎术的三胎妊娠的围产期结局。

方法

对1988年1月至1997年6月间分娩的所有三胎妊娠进行回顾性病历审查。仅纳入妊娠15周前开始产前检查的女性。将宫颈环扎术组与无宫颈环扎术组在孕产妇和围产期结局变量方面进行比较。采用学生t检验、卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验进行分析。

结果

59例三胎妊娠中有20例(33.8%)进行了预防性宫颈环扎术。在比较产妇年龄、产次、早产率、妊娠期糖尿病、贫血、产前使用类固醇、组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎和术后子宫内膜炎时,两组之间无差异。此外,平均出生体重、阿氏评分、呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)、脑室内出血/脑室周围白质软化(IVH/PVL)和新生儿死亡率也无差异。虽然宫颈环扎术组的平均分娩孕周(32.8±2.4周)与无宫颈环扎术组(31.5±3.6周)无差异,但宫颈环扎术组在31周及以上、32周及以上分娩的妊娠比例显著更高(分别为90%对62%,P = 0.02;80%对54%,P = 0.05)。此外,与无宫颈环扎术组相比,宫颈环扎术组极低出生体重(LBW)的发生率显著降低(1.7%对15.4%,P = 0.005)。

结论

预防性宫颈环扎术显著降低了三胎妊娠中极低出生体重新生儿的发生率。宫颈环扎术组在31周及以上、32周及以上分娩的新生儿比例更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验