Mele T S, Stewart K, Marokus B, O'Keefe G E
Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
J Trauma. 1999 May;46(5):847-52. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199905000-00013.
The optimal method of evaluating blunt abdominal trauma remains controversial. A combination of a sensitive screening test, diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), and a specific test, abdominal computed tomography (CT), may be a safe, efficient approach to adult blunt abdominal trauma.
A prospective cohort study compared a protocol using screening DPL followed by selective use of abdominal CT (DPL/abdominal CT) and the use of abdominal CT alone in the evaluation of hemodynamically stable, adult blunt trauma patients.
One hundred sixty-seven adult blunt trauma patients were initially evaluated by DPL (n = 71) or abdominal CT (n = 96). Emergency department evaluation required less time in the DPL/abdominal CT group than in the abdominal CT alone group (41 minutes vs. 2.5 hours; p < 0.001). There were no missed injuries in the DPL/abdominal CT group versus seven missed injuries in the abdominal CT group (p = 0.02). There were no nontherapeutic celiotomies in either study group.
Screening DPL, followed by abdominal CT if positive, is a safe, efficient method of evaluating adult blunt abdominal trauma that reduces the time required to evaluate the abdomen, does not result in increased nontherapeutic celiotomies, results in fewer missed injuries, and reduces the overall use of abdominal CT.
评估钝性腹部创伤的最佳方法仍存在争议。敏感的筛查试验诊断性腹腔灌洗(DPL)与特异性试验腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)相结合,可能是评估成人钝性腹部创伤的一种安全、有效的方法。
一项前瞻性队列研究比较了一种方案,即先进行筛查性DPL,然后选择性使用腹部CT(DPL/腹部CT),与单独使用腹部CT在评估血流动力学稳定的成人钝性创伤患者中的应用。
167例成人钝性创伤患者最初接受了DPL(n = 71)或腹部CT(n = 96)评估。DPL/腹部CT组的急诊科评估所需时间比单独使用腹部CT组少(41分钟对2.5小时;p < 0.001)。DPL/腹部CT组没有漏诊损伤,而腹部CT组有7例漏诊损伤(p = 0.02)。两个研究组均未进行非治疗性剖腹手术。
先进行筛查性DPL,若结果为阳性再进行腹部CT检查,是评估成人钝性腹部创伤的一种安全、有效的方法,可减少评估腹部所需时间,不会导致非治疗性剖腹手术增加,漏诊损伤更少,并减少腹部CT的总体使用。