• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用筛选性诊断性腹腔灌洗并选择性应用腹部计算机断层扫描对钝性腹部创伤进行诊断方案的评估。

Evaluation of a diagnostic protocol using screening diagnostic peritoneal lavage with selective use of abdominal computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma.

作者信息

Mele T S, Stewart K, Marokus B, O'Keefe G E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1999 May;46(5):847-52. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199905000-00013.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199905000-00013
PMID:10338402
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal method of evaluating blunt abdominal trauma remains controversial. A combination of a sensitive screening test, diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), and a specific test, abdominal computed tomography (CT), may be a safe, efficient approach to adult blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study compared a protocol using screening DPL followed by selective use of abdominal CT (DPL/abdominal CT) and the use of abdominal CT alone in the evaluation of hemodynamically stable, adult blunt trauma patients.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-seven adult blunt trauma patients were initially evaluated by DPL (n = 71) or abdominal CT (n = 96). Emergency department evaluation required less time in the DPL/abdominal CT group than in the abdominal CT alone group (41 minutes vs. 2.5 hours; p < 0.001). There were no missed injuries in the DPL/abdominal CT group versus seven missed injuries in the abdominal CT group (p = 0.02). There were no nontherapeutic celiotomies in either study group.

CONCLUSION

Screening DPL, followed by abdominal CT if positive, is a safe, efficient method of evaluating adult blunt abdominal trauma that reduces the time required to evaluate the abdomen, does not result in increased nontherapeutic celiotomies, results in fewer missed injuries, and reduces the overall use of abdominal CT.

摘要

背景

评估钝性腹部创伤的最佳方法仍存在争议。敏感的筛查试验诊断性腹腔灌洗(DPL)与特异性试验腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)相结合,可能是评估成人钝性腹部创伤的一种安全、有效的方法。

方法

一项前瞻性队列研究比较了一种方案,即先进行筛查性DPL,然后选择性使用腹部CT(DPL/腹部CT),与单独使用腹部CT在评估血流动力学稳定的成人钝性创伤患者中的应用。

结果

167例成人钝性创伤患者最初接受了DPL(n = 71)或腹部CT(n = 96)评估。DPL/腹部CT组的急诊科评估所需时间比单独使用腹部CT组少(41分钟对2.5小时;p < 0.001)。DPL/腹部CT组没有漏诊损伤,而腹部CT组有7例漏诊损伤(p = 0.02)。两个研究组均未进行非治疗性剖腹手术。

结论

先进行筛查性DPL,若结果为阳性再进行腹部CT检查,是评估成人钝性腹部创伤的一种安全、有效的方法,可减少评估腹部所需时间,不会导致非治疗性剖腹手术增加,漏诊损伤更少,并减少腹部CT的总体使用。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a diagnostic protocol using screening diagnostic peritoneal lavage with selective use of abdominal computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma.使用筛选性诊断性腹腔灌洗并选择性应用腹部计算机断层扫描对钝性腹部创伤进行诊断方案的评估。
J Trauma. 1999 May;46(5):847-52. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199905000-00013.
2
Complementary roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.诊断性腹腔灌洗与计算机断层扫描在钝性腹部创伤评估中的互补作用。
J Trauma. 2001 Dec;51(6):1128-34; discussion 1134-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200112000-00019.
3
Limiting computed tomography to patients with peritoneal lavage-positive results reduces cost and unnecessary celiotomies in blunt trauma.将计算机断层扫描限于腹腔灌洗结果呈阳性的患者,可降低钝性创伤的成本和不必要的剖腹手术。
Arch Surg. 1996 Sep;131(9):954-8; discussion 958-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430210052010.
4
The complementary roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.诊断性腹腔灌洗与计算机断层扫描在钝性腹部创伤评估中的互补作用。
Surgery. 1989 Oct;106(4):794-800; discussion 800-1.
5
Role of ultrasonography, computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage in abdominal blunt trauma.超声检查、计算机断层扫描及诊断性腹腔灌洗在腹部钝性创伤中的作用
Saudi Med J. 2002 Nov;23(11):1350-5.
6
Speed and efficiency in the resuscitation of blunt trauma patients with multiple injuries: the advantage of diagnostic peritoneal lavage over abdominal computerized tomography.
J Trauma. 1998 Feb;44(2):287-90. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199802000-00008.
7
Limitations of computed tomography in the evaluation of acute abdominal trauma: a prospective comparison with diagnostic peritoneal lavage.
J Trauma. 1985 Oct;25(10):933-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198510000-00002.
8
CT scan and Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage: towards a better diagnosis in the area of nonoperative management of blunt abdominal trauma.CT扫描与诊断性腹腔灌洗:在钝性腹部创伤非手术治疗领域实现更好的诊断
Injury. 2016 Sep;47(9):2006-11. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.034. Epub 2016 Apr 24.
9
A comparison of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography (CT scan) in evaluation of the hemodynamically stable patient with blunt abdominal trauma.诊断性腹腔灌洗与计算机断层扫描(CT扫描)在评估血流动力学稳定的钝性腹部创伤患者中的比较。
J Emerg Med. 1992 May-Jun;10(3):275-80. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(92)90332-n.
10
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage versus abdominal computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma: a review of prospective studies.钝性腹部创伤中诊断性腹腔灌洗与腹部计算机断层扫描的前瞻性研究综述
Can J Surg. 1995 Apr;38(2):117-22.

引用本文的文献

1
[Current diagnostics for intra-abdominal trauma].[当前腹部创伤的诊断方法]
Chirurg. 2005 Oct;76(10):919-26. doi: 10.1007/s00104-005-1092-0.
2
[Shock trauma room diagnosis: initial diagnosis after blunt abdominal trauma. A review of the literature].
Unfallchirurg. 2004 Oct;107(10):892-902. doi: 10.1007/s00113-004-0849-0.
3
Blunt liver injuries in polytrauma: results from a cohort study with the regular use of whole-body helical computed tomography.多发伤中的钝性肝损伤:一项常规使用全身螺旋计算机断层扫描的队列研究结果
World J Surg. 2003 Oct;27(10):1124-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-6981-0. Epub 2003 Aug 18.