Béïque J C, de Montigny C, Blier P, Debonnel G
Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Synapse. 1999 Jun 1;32(3):198-211. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(19990601)32:3<198::AID-SYN6>3.0.CO;2-2.
Using an in vivo electrophysiological paradigm, venlafaxine and paroxetine displayed similar potency for suppressing the firing activity of dorsal raphe 5-HT neurons (ED50: 233 and 211 microg/kg i.v., respectively), while venlafaxine was three times less potent than desipramine (ED50: 727 and 241 microg/kg i.v., respectively) to suppress the firing activity of locus coeruleus NE neurons. The selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635 (100 microg/kg, i.v.) reversed the suppressant effect of venlafaxine and paroxetine on the firing activity of 5-HT neurons and the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist piperoxane (1 mg/kg, i.v.) reversed those of venlafaxine and desipramine on the firing activity of NE neurons. The ED50 of venlafaxine on the firing activity of 5-HT neurons was not altered (ED50: 264 microg/kg) in noradrenergic-lesioned rats, while the suppressant effect of venlafaxine on the firing activity of NE neurons was greater in serotonergic-lesioned rats (ED50: 285 microg/kg). Taken together, these results suggest that, in vivo, venlafaxine blocks both reuptake processes, its potency to block the 5-HT reuptake process being greater than that for NE. Since the affinities of venlafaxine for the 5-HT and NE reuptake carriers are not in keeping with its potencies for suppressing the firing activity of 5-HT and NE neurons, the suppressant effect of venlafaxine on the firing activity of 5-HT and NE neurons observed in vivo may not be mediated solely by its action on the [3H]cyanoimipramine and [3H]nisoxetine binding sites. In an attempt to unravel the mechanism responsible for this peculiarity, in vitro superfusion experiments were carried out in rat brain slices to assess a putative monoamine releasing property for venlafaxine. (+/-)Fenfluramine and tyramine substantially increased the spontaneous outflow of [3H]5-HT and [3H]NE, respectively, while venlafaxine was devoid of such releasing properties.
采用体内电生理学范式,文拉法辛和帕罗西汀在抑制中缝背核5-羟色胺(5-HT)能神经元放电活动方面显示出相似的效力(半数有效剂量[ED50]:分别为静脉注射233和211微克/千克),而在抑制蓝斑去甲肾上腺素(NE)能神经元放电活动方面,文拉法辛的效力比地昔帕明低三倍(ED50:分别为静脉注射727和241微克/千克)。选择性5-HT1A受体拮抗剂WAY 100635(100微克/千克,静脉注射)可逆转文拉法辛和帕罗西汀对5-HT能神经元放电活动的抑制作用,而α2-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂哌罗克生(1毫克/千克,静脉注射)可逆转文拉法辛和地昔帕明对NE能神经元放电活动的抑制作用。在去甲肾上腺素能损伤的大鼠中,文拉法辛对5-HT能神经元放电活动的ED50未改变(ED50:264微克/千克),而在5-羟色胺能损伤的大鼠中,文拉法辛对NE能神经元放电活动的抑制作用更强(ED50:285微克/千克)。综上所述,这些结果表明,在体内,文拉法辛可阻断两种再摄取过程,其阻断5-HT再摄取过程的效力大于对NE的阻断效力。由于文拉法辛对5-HT和NE再摄取载体的亲和力与其抑制5-HT和NE能神经元放电活动的效力不一致,因此在体内观察到的文拉法辛对5-HT和NE能神经元放电活动的抑制作用可能并非仅由其对[3H]氰米帕明和[3H]尼索西汀结合位点的作用介导。为了阐明造成这种特殊性的机制,在大鼠脑片上进行了体外灌流实验,以评估文拉法辛是否具有假定的单胺释放特性。(±)芬氟拉明和酪胺分别显著增加了[3H]5-HT和[3H]NE的自发流出量,而文拉法辛没有这种释放特性。