McNulty C A, Symon F A, Wardlaw A J
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1999 Jun;20(6):1251-9. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.20.6.3531.
We have used the Stamper-Woodruff frozen-section assay (FSA) to characterize the integrin and activation steps involved in adhesion of peripheral blood eosinophils and neutrophils to nasal polyp endothelium (NPE). Eosinophil and neutrophil adhesion was significantly inhibited by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against CD18 (beta2) and CD11a-c. Eosinophil adhesion was also inhibited to a lesser extent by mAbs against CD29 (beta1), CD49d (alpha4), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. The involvement of integrins raised the possibility of an activation step being involved in the adhesion process. Although stimulation of the cells with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) before the assay failed to modulate adhesion, binding was inhibited by up to 50% by treatment of the leukocytes with azide. In addition, neutrophil adhesion was completely abrogated by pertussis toxin (PT) and inhibited by about 50% by the platelet-activating factor antagonist WEB 2086 and antibodies against interleukin (IL)-8 and the two IL-8 receptors IL8RA and IL8RB (C-X-CR1 and -CR2). In contrast, eosinophil adhesion was unaffected by PT, WEB 2086, or anti-IL8R mAbs. mAbs against CCR-3, IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF also had no effect. This study demonstrates that eosinophil and neutrophil adhesion to NPE in the FSA conforms to the multistep paradigm for leukocyte adhesion and can be used to model the molecular basis for adhesion to endothelium in the context of chronic inflammatory disease. Using this assay, we have observed significant differences in integrin usage between eosinophils and neutrophils and a striking difference in the mechanism of integrin activation. These differences could explain, in part, the preferential accumulation of eosinophils in diseases such as asthma.
我们运用斯坦珀 - 伍德拉夫冰冻切片检测法(FSA)来表征外周血嗜酸性粒细胞和中性粒细胞与鼻息肉内皮细胞(NPE)黏附过程中涉及的整合素及激活步骤。抗CD18(β2)和CD11a - c的单克隆抗体(mAb)能显著抑制嗜酸性粒细胞和中性粒细胞的黏附。抗CD29(β1)、CD49d(α4)和血管细胞黏附分子 - 1的mAb对嗜酸性粒细胞黏附也有较小程度的抑制作用。整合素的参与增加了黏附过程中存在激活步骤的可能性。尽管在检测前用粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM - CSF)刺激细胞未能调节黏附,但用叠氮化物处理白细胞可使结合抑制高达50%。此外,百日咳毒素(PT)可完全消除中性粒细胞的黏附,血小板活化因子拮抗剂WEB 2086以及抗白细胞介素(IL)- 8和两种IL - 8受体IL8RA和IL8RB(C - X - C趋化因子受体1和 - CR2)的抗体可使其黏附抑制约50%。相比之下,嗜酸性粒细胞的黏附不受PT、WEB 2086或抗IL8R mAb的影响。抗CCR - 3、IL - 3、IL - 5和GM - CSF的mAb也无作用。本研究表明,在FSA中嗜酸性粒细胞和中性粒细胞与NPE的黏附符合白细胞黏附的多步骤模式,可用于模拟慢性炎症性疾病背景下与内皮细胞黏附的分子基础。通过该检测方法,我们观察到嗜酸性粒细胞和中性粒细胞在整合素使用上存在显著差异,以及整合素激活机制上的显著差异。这些差异可能部分解释了嗜酸性粒细胞在哮喘等疾病中的优先积聚现象。