Hull C C, Liu C S, Sciscio A
Applied Vision Research Centre, Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London EC1V 7DD.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;83(6):656-63. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.6.656.
To evaluate the image quality produced by polypseudophakia used for strongly hypermetropic and nanophthalmic eyes.
Primary aberration theory and ray tracing analysis were used to calculate the optimum lens shapes and power distribution between the two intraocular lenses for two example eyes: one a strongly hypermetropic eye, the other a nanophthalmic eye. Spherical aberration and oblique astigmatism were considered. Modulation transfer function (MTF) curves were computed using commercial optical design software (Sigma 2100, Kidger Optics Ltd) to assess axial image quality, and the sagittal and tangential image surfaces were computed to study image quality across the field.
A significant improvement in the axial MTF was found for the eyes with double implants. However, results indicate that this may be realised as a better contrast sensitivity in the low to mid spatial frequency range rather than as a better Snellen acuity. The optimum lens shapes for minimum spherical aberration (best axial image quality) were approximately convex-plano for both lenses with the convex surface facing the cornea. Conversely, the optimum lens shapes for zero oblique astigmatism were strongly meniscus with the anterior surface concave. Correction of oblique astigmatism was only achieved with a loss in axial performance.
Optimum estimated visual acuity exceeds 6/5 in both the hypermetropic and the nanophthalmic eyes studied (pupil size of 4 mm) with polypseudophakic correction. These results can be attained using convex-plano or biconvex lenses with the most convex surface facing the cornea. If the posterior surface of the posterior intraocular lens is convex, as is commonly used to help prevent migration of lens epithelial cells causing posterior capsular opacification (PCO), then it is still possible to achieve 6/4.5 in the hypermetropic eye and 6/5.3 in the nanophthalmic eye provided the anterior intraocular lens has an approximately convex-plano shape with the convex surface anterior. It was therefore concluded that consideration of optical image quality does not demand that additional intraocular lens shapes need to be manufactured for polypseudophakic correction of extremely short eyes and that implanting the posterior intraocular lens in the conventional orientation to help prevent PCO does not necessarily limit estimated visual acuity.
评估用于强远视眼和小眼球眼的多焦点人工晶状体所产生的图像质量。
运用初级像差理论和光线追迹分析,针对两只示例眼计算两枚人工晶状体之间的最佳晶状体形状和屈光力分布:一只为强远视眼,另一只为小眼球眼。考虑了球差和斜向散光。使用商业光学设计软件(Sigma 2100,Kidger Optics Ltd)计算调制传递函数(MTF)曲线以评估轴向图像质量,并计算矢状面和切向像面以研究整个视野的图像质量。
对于植入双枚人工晶状体的眼睛,轴向MTF有显著改善。然而,结果表明这可能表现为在低至中频空间频率范围内更好的对比敏感度,而非更好的斯内伦视力。对于最小球差(最佳轴向图像质量)而言,两枚晶状体的最佳晶状体形状大致均为凸平形,凸面朝向角膜。相反,对于零斜向散光,最佳晶状体形状为强弯月形,前表面为凹面。矫正斜向散光仅以轴向性能的损失为代价。
在接受多焦点人工晶状体矫正的远视眼和小眼球眼中(瞳孔直径4mm),估计的最佳视力均超过6/5。使用凸平形或双凸形晶状体,且最凸面朝向角膜,即可获得这些结果。如果后房型人工晶状体的后表面为凸面,这是常用于帮助防止晶状体上皮细胞迁移导致后囊膜混浊(PCO)的做法,那么只要前房型人工晶状体具有大致凸平形且凸面朝前,远视眼中仍可达到6/4.5,小眼球眼中可达到6/5.3。因此得出结论,考虑光学图像质量并不要求为极短眼的多焦点人工晶状体矫正制造额外的晶状体形状,并且以常规方向植入后房型人工晶状体以帮助预防PCO并不一定会限制估计的视力。