Suppr超能文献

老年患者急性心肌梗死后医院规模与生存率之间的关联。

The association between hospital volume and survival after acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients.

作者信息

Thiemann D R, Coresh J, Oetgen W J, Powe N R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1999 May 27;340(21):1640-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199905273402106.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with chest pain thought to be due to acute coronary ischemia are typically taken by ambulance to the nearest hospital. The potential benefit of field triage directly to a hospital that treats a large number of patients with myocardial infarction is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the relation between the number of Medicare patients with myocardial infarction that each hospital in the study treated (hospital volume) and long-term survival among 98,898 Medicare patients 65 years of age or older. We used proportional-hazards methods to adjust for clinical, demographic, and health-system-related variables, including the availability of invasive procedures, the specialty of the attending physician, and the area of residence of the patient (rural, urban, or metropolitan).

RESULTS

The patients in the quartile admitted to hospitals with the lowest volume were 17 percent more likely to die within 30 days after admission than patients in the quartile admitted to hospitals with the highest volume (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.09 to 1.26; P<0.001), which resulted in 2.3 more deaths per 100 patients. The crude mortality rate at one year was 29.8 percent among the patients admitted to the lowest-volume hospitals, as compared with 27.0 percent among those admitted to the highest-volume hospitals. There was a continuous inverse dose-response relation between hospital volume and the risk of death. In an analysis of subgroups defined according to age, history of cardiac disease, Killip class of infarction, presence or absence of contraindications to thrombolytic therapy, and time from the onset of symptoms, survival at high-volume hospitals was consistently better than at low-volume hospitals. The availability of technology for angioplasty and bypass surgery was not independently associated with overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute myocardial infarction who are admitted directly to hospitals that have more experience treating myocardial infarction, as reflected by their case volume, are more likely to survive than are patients admitted to low-volume hospitals.

摘要

背景

被认为因急性冠状动脉缺血而胸痛的患者通常由救护车送往最近的医院。直接将患者分流到治疗大量心肌梗死患者的医院的潜在益处尚不清楚。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究了本研究中每家医院治疗的医疗保险心肌梗死患者数量(医院容量)与98898名65岁及以上医疗保险患者长期生存之间的关系。我们使用比例风险方法来调整临床、人口统计学和卫生系统相关变量,包括侵入性手术的可用性、主治医生的专业以及患者的居住地区(农村、城市或大都市)。

结果

入院到容量最低医院四分位数组的患者在入院后30天内死亡的可能性比入院到容量最高医院四分位数组的患者高17%(风险比,1.17;95%置信区间,1.09至1.26;P< 0.001),这导致每100名患者多死亡2.3人。容量最低医院的患者一年粗死亡率为29.8%,而容量最高医院的患者为27.0%。医院容量与死亡风险之间存在持续的反向剂量反应关系。在根据年龄、心脏病史、梗死Killip分级、溶栓治疗有无禁忌症以及症状发作时间定义的亚组分析中,大容量医院的生存率始终优于小容量医院。血管成形术和搭桥手术技术的可用性与总体死亡率无独立关联。

结论

如病例数量所反映的,直接入住治疗心肌梗死经验更丰富医院的急性心肌梗死患者比入住小容量医院的患者更有可能存活。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验