Krupinski E A, McNeill K, Ovitt T W, Alden S, Holcomb M
Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85724, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 1999 May;12(2 Suppl 1):166-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03168790.
The Radiology Department at the University of Arizona has been operating a teleradiology program for almost 2 years. The goal of this project was to characterize the types of cases reviewed, to assess radiologists' satisfaction with the program, and to examine case turnaround times. On average, about 50 teleradiology cases are interpreted each month. Computed tomography (CT) cases are the most common type of case, constituting 65% of the total case volume. Average turnaround time (to generate a "wet read" once a case is received) is about 1.3 hours. Image quality was rated as generally good to excellent, and the user interface as generally good. Radiologists' confidence in their diagnostic decisions is about the same as reading films in the clinical environment. The most common reason for not being able to read teleradiology images is poor image quality, followed by lack of clinical history and not enough images.
亚利桑那大学放射科开展远程放射学项目已近两年。该项目的目标是明确所审查病例的类型,评估放射科医生对该项目的满意度,并检查病例周转时间。平均每月解读约50例远程放射学病例。计算机断层扫描(CT)病例是最常见的病例类型,占病例总量的65%。平均周转时间(收到病例后生成“初步解读”报告)约为1.3小时。图像质量总体评定为良好至优秀,用户界面总体良好。放射科医生对其诊断决策的信心与在临床环境中阅片时大致相同。无法读取远程放射学图像的最常见原因是图像质量差,其次是缺乏临床病史和图像不足。