Tissot E, Cornette C, Demoly P, Jacquet M, Barale F, Capellier G
Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, France.
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Apr;25(4):353-9. doi: 10.1007/s001340050857.
To assess the type, frequency and potential clinical significance of medication-administration errors.
Prospective study using the observation technique as described by the American Society of HealthSystem Pharmacists but eliminating the disguised aspect.
Medical intensive care unit (ICU) in a university hospital.
2009 medication administration interventions by nurses.
Pharmacist-performed observation of preparation and administration of medication by nurses, comparison with the original medical order and comparison with the data available in the literature.
132 (6.6% of 2009 observed events) errors were detected. Their distribution is as follows: 41 dose errors, 29 wrong rate, 24 wrong preparation technique, 19 physicochemical incompatibility, 10 wrong administration technique and 9 wrong time errors. No fatal errors were observed, but 26 of 132 errors were potentially life-threatening and 55 potentially significant.
According to this first observation-based study of medication administration errors in a European ICU, these errors were due to deficiencies in the overall organisation of the hospital medication track, in patient follow-up and in staff training.
评估用药错误的类型、频率及潜在临床意义。
采用美国卫生系统药师协会描述的观察技术进行前瞻性研究,但剔除了伪装环节。
一所大学医院的医疗重症监护病房(ICU)。
护士执行的2009次用药干预。
药师对护士用药的配制和给药过程进行观察,与原始医嘱进行比较,并与文献中的数据进行比较。
检测到132例错误(占2009次观察事件的6.6%)。其分布如下:41例剂量错误、29例错误率、24例错误配制技术、19例理化不相容、10例错误给药技术和9例错误时间错误。未观察到致命错误,但132例错误中有26例可能危及生命,55例可能具有重大意义。
根据这项在欧洲ICU首次基于观察的用药错误研究,这些错误归因于医院用药流程的整体组织、患者随访及人员培训方面的不足。