Barclay S, Todd C, McCabe J, Hunt T
Primary Care Research Unit, University of Cambridge.
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Mar;49(440):181-6.
General practitioners (GPs) have become more responsible for budget allocation over the years. The 1997 White Paper has signalled major changes in GPs' roles in commissioning. In general, palliative care is ranked as a high priority, and such services are therefore likely to be early candidates for commissioning.
To examine the different commissioning priorities within the primary health care team (PHCT) by ascertaining the views of GPs and district nurses (DNs) concerning their priorities for the future planning of local palliative care services and the adequacy of services as currently provided.
A postal questionnaire survey was sent to 167 GP principals and 96 registered DNs in the Cambridge area to ascertain ratings of service development priority and service adequacy, for which written comments were received.
Replies were received from 141 (84.4%) GPs and 86 (90%) DNs. Both professional groups agreed that the most important service developments were urgent hospice admission for symptom control or terminal care, and Marie Curie nurses. GPs gave greater priority than DNs to specialist doctor home visits and Macmillan nurses. DNs gave greater priority than GPs to Marie Curie nurses, hospital-at-home, non-cancer patients' urgent hospice admission, day care, and hospice outpatients. For each of the eight services where significant differences were found in perceptions of service adequacy, DNs rated the service to be less adequate than GPs.
The 1997 White Paper, The New NHS, has indicated that the various forms of GP purchasing are to be replaced by primary care groups (PCGs), in which both GPs and DNs are to be involved in commissioning decisions. For many palliative care services, DNs' views of service adequacy and priorities for future development differ significantly from their GP colleagues; resolution of these differences will need to be attained within PCGs. Both professional groups give high priority to the further development of quick-response clinical services, especially urgent hospice admission and Marie Curie nurses.
多年来,全科医生(GPs)在预算分配方面承担了更多责任。1997年的白皮书标志着全科医生在委托任务中的角色发生了重大变化。总体而言,姑息治疗被列为高度优先事项,因此此类服务很可能是委托任务的早期候选对象。
通过确定全科医生和社区护士(DNs)对当地姑息治疗服务未来规划的优先事项以及当前提供的服务充足性的看法,来研究初级卫生保健团队(PHCT)内部不同的委托优先事项。
向剑桥地区的167名全科医生负责人和96名注册社区护士发送了邮政问卷调查,以确定服务发展优先事项和服务充足性的评级,并收到了书面评论。
收到了141名(84.4%)全科医生和86名(90%)社区护士的回复。两个专业群体都认为最重要的服务发展是为控制症状或临终护理而紧急入住临终关怀医院,以及玛丽·居里护士。与社区护士相比,全科医生更优先考虑专科医生家访和麦克米伦护士。与全科医生相比,社区护士更优先考虑玛丽·居里护士、居家医院、非癌症患者紧急入住临终关怀医院、日间护理和临终关怀门诊。在对服务充足性的认知方面发现存在显著差异的八项服务中,社区护士对每项服务的评级都低于全科医生。
1997年的白皮书《新国民健康服务》表明,全科医生的各种采购形式将由初级保健团体(PCGs)取代,全科医生和社区护士都将参与委托决策。对于许多姑息治疗服务,社区护士对服务充足性和未来发展优先事项的看法与其全科医生同事有显著差异;这些差异需要在初级保健团体内部得到解决。两个专业群体都高度优先考虑快速反应临床服务的进一步发展,尤其是紧急入住临终关怀医院和玛丽·居里护士。