• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

需求评估与姑息治疗:提供者的观点

Needs assessment and palliative care: the views of providers.

作者信息

Clark D, Malson H, Small N, Daniel T, Mallett K

机构信息

Department of Surgical and Anaesthetic Sciences, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital.

出版信息

J Public Health Med. 1997 Dec;19(4):437-42. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024674.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024674
PMID:9467151
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A key element within the programme of reform introduced into the UK National Health Service in the 1990s has been the concept of health needs assessment, which must be undertaken by health care purchasers as a guide to the planning process. As part of a wide-ranging study of the impact of the NHS reforms on hospices and specialist palliative care services, providers' perceptions of needs assessment for palliative care were examined, including the extent to which needs assessments had been carried out in local districts, together with the implications.

METHODS

The study comprised two key elements. In spring 1995 a postal survey was conducted among all UK hospices and specialist palliative care in-patient units (n = 203) eliciting factual information concerning needs assessment and contracting, together with perceptions and evaluations of the local impact of the NHS reforms. A total of 128 (63 per cent) questionnaires was completed and returned. In addition to the survey, 12 case studies were conducted with a stratified random sample of NHS, independent and large or small hospices and specialist palliative care units. Each of the 12 case study sites was visited by a member of the research team, who conducted interviews with senior staff and analysed financial, planning and management data. Thus the survey allowed a wide analysis of the impact of the NHS reforms, which was enhanced by the more in-depth qualitative data gathered from the case studies.

RESULTS

In the survey 49 per cent of those responding reported that their main purchaser had conducted a needs assessment for palliative care in the last five years. Palliative care needs assessment was seen as valuable by providers: 73 per cent considered it very important and 28 per cent of hospices had gone so far as to request a needs assessment from their health authority. In an open-ended question seeking views on the impact of health needs assessment, 66 per cent of those responding (71/107) stated that the impact had been or would be positive. The case studies, however, revealed a more mixed picture. The 12 hospices or specialist palliative care units had contracts with a total of 24 health authorities, 12 of which had conducted some type of needs assessment for palliative care. On close examination the comprehensiveness of these was questionable. Few providers had participated in the design and there were low levels of knowledge about the findings. High expectations of the value of needs assessment were often not fulfilled. There was also a tendency for providers to view needs assessment in a purely instrumental light, as a vehicle to further promote their own interests.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care needs assessment has considerable potential to influence future purchasing and service provision, yet not all health commissions are undertaking it. There is a high level of provider enthusiasm for palliative care needs assessment, albeit coupled to low levels of technical knowledge and a lack of involvement in the process at local level. Purchaser-provider dialogue on needs assessment should focus on both raising awareness of appropriate techniques and debating 'ethical neutrality' about the outcome.

摘要

背景

20世纪90年代英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)改革方案的一个关键要素是健康需求评估的概念,医疗服务购买者必须进行此项评估,以此作为规划过程的指导。作为对NHS改革对临终关怀机构和专科姑息治疗服务影响的广泛研究的一部分,研究人员考察了提供者对姑息治疗需求评估的看法,包括当地地区进行需求评估的程度及其影响。

方法

该研究包括两个关键要素。1995年春季,对英国所有临终关怀机构和专科姑息治疗住院单元(n = 203)进行了邮寄调查,收集有关需求评估和签约的实际信息,以及对NHS改革当地影响的看法和评价。共收到并返回了128份(63%)问卷。除了调查之外,还对NHS、独立以及大型或小型临终关怀机构和专科姑息治疗单元进行分层随机抽样,开展了12个案例研究。研究团队成员走访了12个案例研究地点中的每一个,与高级工作人员进行访谈,并分析财务、规划和管理数据。因此,该调查能够对NHS改革的影响进行广泛分析,而从案例研究中收集的更深入的定性数据则增强了这一分析。

结果

在调查中,49%的受访者表示其主要购买者在过去五年中对姑息治疗进行了需求评估。提供者认为姑息治疗需求评估具有价值:73%的人认为它非常重要,28%的临终关怀机构甚至已要求其卫生当局进行需求评估。在一个寻求对健康需求评估影响看法的开放式问题中,66%的受访者(71/107)表示影响已经或将会是积极的。然而案例研究呈现出更为复杂的情况。这12家临终关怀机构或专科姑息治疗单元与总共24个卫生当局签订了合同,其中12个卫生当局对姑息治疗进行了某种类型的需求评估。经仔细审查,这些评估的全面性值得怀疑。很少有提供者参与设计,对评估结果的了解程度也很低。对需求评估价值的高期望往往没有实现。提供者还倾向于纯粹从工具性角度看待需求评估,将其作为进一步促进自身利益的手段。

结论

姑息治疗需求评估对未来的购买和服务提供具有相当大的影响力,但并非所有卫生委员会都在开展此项工作。提供者对姑息治疗需求评估热情高涨,尽管技术知识水平较低且在地方层面缺乏参与。购买者与提供者在需求评估方面的对话应既注重提高对适当技术的认识,又要就结果的“道德中立性”展开辩论。

相似文献

1
Needs assessment and palliative care: the views of providers.需求评估与姑息治疗:提供者的观点
J Public Health Med. 1997 Dec;19(4):437-42. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024674.
2
A national survey of health professionals and volunteers working in voluntary hospice services in the UK. I. Attitudes to current issues affecting hospices and palliative care.英国一项针对在志愿临终关怀服务机构工作的卫生专业人员和志愿者的全国性调查。一、对影响临终关怀机构和姑息治疗的当前问题的态度。
Palliat Med. 2005 Jan;19(1):40-8. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm930oa.
3
Eye donation from palliative and hospice care contexts: the EDiPPPP mixed-methods study.从姑息治疗和临终关怀环境中进行眼捐献:EDiPPPP 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Nov;11(20):1-159. doi: 10.3310/KJWA6741.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Palliative care services: what needs assessment?姑息治疗服务:需要进行哪些评估?
Palliat Med. 1995 Oct;9(4):287-93. doi: 10.1177/026921639500900403.
6
Enhancing integrated palliative care: what models are appropriate? A cross-case analysis.强化姑息治疗综合服务:哪些模式较为适宜?跨案例分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Nov 28;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0250-8.
7
Hospices and palliative care for children: converging stories.儿童临终关怀和姑息治疗:交汇的故事。
Br Med Bull. 2019 Jun 19;130(1):81-88. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldz012.
8
Knowledge based commissioning: can a national clinical effectiveness policy be compatible with seeking local professional advice?基于知识的委托:国家临床疗效政策能否与寻求当地专业建议相兼容?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Jan;1(1):28-34. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100106.
9
Assessing palliative care needs: views of patients, informal carers and healthcare professionals.评估姑息治疗需求:患者、非正式照护者及医疗保健专业人员的观点
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jan;57(1):77-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04062.x.
10
Exploring the rewards and challenges of paediatric palliative care work - a qualitative study of a multi-disciplinary children's hospice care team.探索儿科姑息治疗工作的回报和挑战 - 多学科儿童临终关怀团队的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Dec 16;16(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0254-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Palliative Care: Taking the Long View.姑息治疗:着眼长远。
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Oct 16;9:1140. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01140. eCollection 2018.
2
Prospective integration of cultural consideration in biomedical research for patients with advanced cancer: recommendations from an international conference on malignant bowel obstruction in palliative care.在晚期癌症患者的生物医学研究中前瞻性纳入文化考量:姑息治疗中恶性肠梗阻国际会议的建议
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jul;34(1 Suppl):S28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.04.009. Epub 2007 May 25.
3
An increasing number of qualitative research papers in oncology and palliative care: does it mean a thorough development of the methodology of research?
肿瘤学和姑息治疗领域中定性研究论文数量不断增加:这是否意味着研究方法的全面发展?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Jan 23;2:7. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-7.
4
Out-of-hours palliative care in the UK: perspectives from general practice and specialist services.英国非工作时间的姑息治疗:来自全科医疗和专科服务的观点。
J R Soc Med. 2002 Jan;95(1):28-30. doi: 10.1177/014107680209500108.
5
Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services.初级保健团体对服务的委托:全科医生和社区护士在姑息治疗服务方面的不同优先事项。
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Mar;49(440):181-6.
6
Palliative medicine: is it really specialist territory?姑息医学:它真的是专科领域吗?
J R Soc Med. 1998 Nov;91(11):568-72. doi: 10.1177/014107689809101105.