Bäuml K H
Institut für Psychologie, Universität Regensburg, Germany.
Vision Res. 1999 Apr;39(8):1531-50. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00192-8.
In two experiments simultaneous color constancy was measured using simulations of illuminated surfaces presented on a CRT monitor. Subjects saw two identical Mondrians side-by-side: one Mondrian rendered under a standard illuminant, the other rendered under one of several test illuminants. The matching field was adjusted under the test illuminant so that it (a) had the same hue, saturation, and brightness (appearance match) or (b) looked as if it were cut from the same piece of paper (surface match) as a test surface under the standard illuminant. Matches were set for three different surface collections. The surface matches showed a much higher level of constancy than the appearance matches. The adjustment in the surface matches was nearly complete in the L and M cone data, and deviations from perfect constancy were mainly due to failures in the adjustment of the S cone signals. Besides this difference in amount of adjustment, the appearance and surface matches showed two major similarities. First, both types of matches were well described by simple parametric models. In particular, a model based on the notion of von Kries adjustment provided a good, although not perfect, description of the data. Second, for both types of matches the illuminant adjustment was largely independent of the surface collection in the image. The two types of matches thus differed only quantitatively, there was no qualitative difference between them.
在两项实验中,使用阴极射线管(CRT)显示器上呈现的照明表面模拟来测量同时颜色恒常性。受试者并排看到两个相同的蒙德里安图像:一个蒙德里安图像在标准光源下呈现,另一个在几种测试光源之一的条件下呈现。在测试光源下调整匹配区域,使其(a)具有相同的色调、饱和度和亮度(外观匹配),或者(b)看起来好像是从与标准光源下的测试表面相同的一张纸上裁剪下来的(表面匹配)。针对三种不同的表面集合进行匹配设置。表面匹配显示出比外观匹配更高水平的恒常性。在L和M视锥细胞数据中,表面匹配中的调整几乎是完全的,与完美恒常性的偏差主要是由于S视锥细胞信号调整失败。除了调整量的这种差异外,外观匹配和表面匹配还显示出两个主要的相似之处。首先,两种类型的匹配都可以通过简单的参数模型很好地描述。特别是,基于冯·克里兹调整概念的模型对数据提供了一个良好的(尽管并不完美)描述。其次,对于两种类型的匹配,光源调整在很大程度上与图像中的表面集合无关。因此,这两种类型的匹配仅在数量上有所不同,它们之间没有质的区别。