Lucassen M P, Walraven J
TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
Vision Res. 1996 Sep;36(17):2699-711. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00346-0.
Color constancy was studied under conditions simulating either natural or extremely artificial illumination. Four test illuminants were used: two broadband phases of daylight (correlated color temperatures 4000 and 25,000 K) and two spectrally impoverished metamers of these lights, each consisting of only two wavelengths. A computer controlled color monitor was used for reproducing the chromaticities and luminances of an array of Munsell color samples rendered under these illuminants. An asymmetric haploscopic matching paradigm was used in which the same stimulus pattern, either illuminated by one of the test illuminants, or by a standard broadband daylight (D65), was alternately presented to the left and right eye. Subjects adjusted the RGB settings of the samples seen under D65 (match condition), to match the appearance of the color samples seen under the test illuminant. The results show the expected failure of color constancy under two-wavelengths illumination, and approximate color constancy under natural illumination. Quantitative predictions of the results were made on the basis of two different models, a computational model for recovering surface reflectance, and a model that assumes the color response to be determined by cone-specific contrast and absolute level of stimulation (Lucassen & Walraven, 1993). The latter model was found to provide somewhat more accurate predictions, under all illuminant conditions.
在模拟自然光照或极端人工光照的条件下研究了颜色恒常性。使用了四种测试光源:日光的两个宽带阶段(相关色温分别为4000K和25000K)以及这两种光的两个光谱简化同色异谱色,每种仅由两个波长组成。使用计算机控制的彩色显示器来再现这些光源下呈现的一系列孟塞尔颜色样本的色度和亮度。采用了一种不对称双眼匹配范式,其中相同的刺激模式,要么由测试光源之一照亮,要么由标准宽带日光(D65)照亮,交替呈现给左眼和右眼。受试者调整在D65下看到的样本的RGB设置(匹配条件),以匹配在测试光源下看到的颜色样本的外观。结果表明,在双波长光照下颜色恒常性出现预期的失效,而在自然光照下颜色恒常性大致存在。基于两种不同的模型对结果进行了定量预测,一种是用于恢复表面反射率的计算模型,另一种模型假设颜色响应由特定视锥细胞的对比度和绝对刺激水平决定(卢卡斯森和瓦尔拉文,1993)。发现在所有光源条件下,后一种模型能提供更准确的预测。