MacStravic R S
Health Prog. 1999 Jan-Feb;80(1):54-7.
When challenged to demonstrate their contributions to the community, Catholic and other not-for-profit hospitals have traditionally reported the sum of their charity care, free programs, and unprofitable services. But critics of tax-exempt healthcare now say this is insufficient and ask such hospitals for descriptions of the outcomes of their contributions. There are seven basic measures for gauging outcomes: participation, mind states, behavior, health status, sickness care utilization, sickness care expenditures, and community value. Some of these measures will, when used singly, fail to produce clear and convincing results. Moreover, all of them must be accompanied by a foundation for attribution. Finally, the hospital must be able to show that the outcomes have significant value for the community. But documenting the complete set of effects is worth the effort spent on it. Hospitals that carefully weigh the results of their contributions increase the likelihood that their community will truly benefit from them, and will themselves benefit from their ability to show that this is so.
当被要求证明其对社区的贡献时,天主教医院和其他非营利性医院传统上会报告其慈善医疗、免费项目和无盈利服务的总和。但免税医疗的批评者现在表示,这还不够,并要求此类医院描述其贡献的成果。有七种衡量成果的基本方法:参与度、心理状态、行为、健康状况、疾病护理利用率、疾病护理支出和社区价值。其中一些方法单独使用时,可能无法产生清晰且有说服力的结果。此外,所有这些方法都必须有一个归因基础。最后,医院必须能够证明这些成果对社区具有重大价值。但记录整套效果是值得付出努力的。仔细权衡其贡献结果的医院,会增加其社区真正从中受益的可能性,并且自身也会因能够证明这一点而受益。