Burkin K, Kleiner B H
Department of Management, School of Business Administration and Economics, California State University, Fullerton, USA.
Health Manpow Manage. 1998;24(2-3):119-24. doi: 10.1108/09552069810207088.
Health-care providers throughout the United States face litigation and the threat of litigation on a daily basis due to claims of patient abuse. Hidden within the costs associated with defending patient abuse claims are the wrongful termination filings made by employees who claim they were retaliated against for their whistleblowing activity. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate why an employer would resort to retaliatory acts in the shadow of a patient abuse filing and to discuss what steps are currently taken to prove and investigate the validity of a retaliation claim. Included within the body of this paper are court decisions on the topics of whistleblowing protection and violation of public policy. These examples are illustrated so that recommendations can be provided that assist the employer in avoiding a wrongful discharge claim and help to conclude that retaliation against the whistleblower is a costly mistake even with the employment at-will principle as a defense.
由于存在患者虐待指控,美国各地的医疗保健提供者每天都面临诉讼以及诉讼威胁。在与抗辩患者虐待指控相关的成本中,隐藏着员工提出的不当解雇申请,这些员工声称他们因举报行为而遭到报复。本文的目的是说明雇主为何会在患者虐待指控的阴影下采取报复行为,并讨论目前为证明和调查报复指控的有效性采取了哪些步骤。本文主体部分包括关于举报保护和违反公共政策主题的法院判决。列举这些例子是为了能够提出相关建议,帮助雇主避免不当解雇指控,并得出结论:即使以随意雇佣原则作为抗辩理由,对举报人进行报复也是一个代价高昂的错误。