Diagnosis of suspected coronary artery disease in women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in women is not well defined. We compared the cost-effectiveness of several strategies for diagnosing CAD in women with chest pain.

METHODS

We performed decision and cost-effectiveness analyses with simulations of 55-year-old ambulatory women with chest pain. With a Markov model, simulations of patients underwent exercise electrocardiography, exercise testing with thallium scintigraphy, exercise echocardiography, angiography, or no workup.

RESULTS

Diagnosis with angiography cost less than $17, 000 per quality-adjusted life-year compared with exercise echocardiography if the patient had definite angina and less than $76,000 per life-year if she had probable angina. If she had nonspecific chest pain, diagnosis with exercise echocardiography increased life-years compared with no testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost-effectiveness of first-line diagnostic strategy for diagnosis of CAD in women varies mostly according to pretest probability of CAD. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease with angiography is cost-effective in 55-year-old women with definite angina. In 55-year-old women with probable angina, diagnosis with angiography would increase quality-adjusted life-years but significantly increase costs. Use of exercise echocardiography as a first-line diagnosis for CAD is cost effective in 55-year-old women with probable angina and nonspecific chest pain.