Suppr超能文献

清醒大鼠压力反射敏感性测定三种方法的比较

Comparison of three methods for the determination of baroreflex sensitivity in conscious rats.

作者信息

Farah V M, Moreira E D, Pires M D, Irigoyen M C, Krieger E M

机构信息

Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil.

出版信息

Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999 Mar;32(3):361-9. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x1999000300018.

Abstract

Baroreflex sensitivity was studied in the same group of conscious rats using vasoactive drugs (phenylephrine and sodium nitroprusside) administered by three different approaches: 1) bolus injection, 2) steady-state (blood pressure (BP) changes produced in steps), 3) ramp infusion (30 s, brief infusion). The heart rate (HR) responses were evaluated by the mean index (mean ratio of all HR changes and mean arterial pressure (MAP) changes), by linear regression and by the logistic method (maximum gain of the sigmoid curve by a logistic function). The experiments were performed on three consecutive days. Basal MAP and resting HR were similar on all days of the study. Bradycardic responses evaluated by the mean index (-1.5 +/- 0.2, -2.1 +/- 0.2 and -1.6 +/- 0.2 bpm/mmHg) and linear regression (-1.8 +/- 0.3, -1.4 +/- 0.3 and -1.7 +/- 0.2 bpm/mmHg) were similar for all three approaches used to change blood pressure. The tachycardic responses to decreases of MAP were similar when evaluated by linear regression (-3.9 +/- 0.8, -2.1 +/- 0.7 and -3.8 +/- 0.4 bpm/mmHg). However, the tachycardic mean index (-3.1 +/- 0.4, -6.6 +/- 1 and -3.6 +/- 0.5 bpm/mmHg) was higher when assessed by the steady-state method. The average gain evaluated by logistic function (-3.5 +/- 0.6, -7.6 +/- 1.3 and -3.8 +/- 0.4 bpm/mmHg) was similar to the reflex tachycardic values, but different from the bradycardic values. Since different ways to change BP may alter the afferent baroreceptor function, the MAP changes obtained during short periods of time (up to 30 s: bolus and ramp infusion) are more appropriate to prevent the acute resetting. Assessment of the baroreflex sensitivity by mean index and linear regression permits a separate analysis of gain for reflex bradycardia and reflex tachycardia. Although two values of baroreflex sensitivity cannot be evaluated by a single symmetric logistic function, this method has the advantage of better comparing the baroreflex sensitivity of animals with different basal blood pressures.

摘要

在同一组清醒大鼠中,使用血管活性药物(去氧肾上腺素和硝普钠),通过三种不同方法研究压力反射敏感性:1)推注;2)稳态(逐步产生血压(BP)变化);3)斜坡输注(30秒,短暂输注)。通过平均指数(所有心率变化与平均动脉压(MAP)变化的平均比值)、线性回归和逻辑方法(逻辑函数对S形曲线的最大增益)评估心率(HR)反应。实验连续进行三天。研究的所有天数中,基础MAP和静息HR相似。通过平均指数(-1.5±0.2、-2.1±0.2和-1.6±0.2次/分钟/毫米汞柱)和线性回归(-1.8±0.3、-1.4±0.3和-1.7±0.2次/分钟/毫米汞柱)评估的心动过缓反应,对于用于改变血压的所有三种方法而言相似。通过线性回归评估时,对MAP降低的心动过速反应相似(-3.9±0.8、-2.1±0.7和-3.8±0.4次/分钟/毫米汞柱)。然而,通过稳态方法评估时,心动过速平均指数(-3.1±0.4、-6.6±1和-3.6±0.5次/分钟/毫米汞柱)更高。通过逻辑函数评估的平均增益(-3.5±0.6、-7.6±1.3和-3.8±0.4次/分钟/毫米汞柱)与反射性心动过速值相似,但与心动过缓值不同。由于改变BP的不同方式可能改变传入压力感受器功能,在短时间内(长达30秒:推注和斜坡输注)获得的MAP变化更适合防止急性重新设定。通过平均指数和线性回归评估压力反射敏感性,可以分别分析反射性心动过缓和反射性心动过速的增益。虽然压力反射敏感性的两个值不能通过单个对称逻辑函数评估,但该方法具有更好地比较不同基础血压动物的压力反射敏感性的优点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验