McHutchison J G, Poynard T
Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19 Suppl 1:57-65.
The limited efficacy of alpha interferon (IFN) monotherapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has led to the investigation of alternative treatment approaches, including combining interferons with other antiviral agents. In several small, pilot studies, the combination of IFN plus ribavirin was significantly more effective than IFN monotherapy for the initial treatment of HCV. The encouraging results from these studies provided the rationale for conducting two (one US, one International) large, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of IFN plus ribavirin therapy for the initial treatment of HCV patients. Of patients receiving therapy [corrected] for 24 weeks, 31% (US) and 35% (International) achieved sustained virologic remission with interferon plus ribavirin [corrected], compared with only 6% (US) receiving interferon [corrected] plus placebo. Sustained virologic response rates were improved in patients treated for 48 weeks (interferon plus ribavirin, 38% [US]; 43% [International] compared to interferon plus placebo, 13% [US]; 19% [International]) [corrected]. Improvement was also observed in terms of biochemical and histologic end points in those receiving combination therapy. Pretreatment variables (HCV genotype, viral burden, stage of fibrosis) were less important as predictors of treatment outcome in patients receiving combination therapy. The safety profile of combination therapy reflected the individual safety profiles of IFN and ribavirin, without synergism. Combination therapy with IFN plus ribavirin was more effective than IFN monotherapy for the initial treatment of HCV in terms of virologic, biochemical, and histologic end points. The combination appears to be well tolerated with a predictable safety profile.
α干扰素(IFN)单药治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的疗效有限,这促使人们研究其他治疗方法,包括将干扰素与其他抗病毒药物联合使用。在几项小型试点研究中,IFN联合利巴韦林在HCV初始治疗中比IFN单药治疗显著更有效。这些研究的令人鼓舞的结果为开展两项(一项在美国,一项在国际上)针对HCV患者初始治疗的IFN联合利巴韦林治疗的大型、多中心、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验提供了理论依据。接受治疗24周的患者中,31%(美国)和35%(国际)使用干扰素加利巴韦林实现了持续病毒学缓解,而接受干扰素加安慰剂的患者中只有6%(美国)实现了持续病毒学缓解。接受48周治疗的患者的持续病毒学应答率有所提高(干扰素加利巴韦林,美国为38%;国际为43%,相比之下,干扰素加安慰剂,美国为13%;国际为19%)。接受联合治疗的患者在生化和组织学终点方面也有改善。在接受联合治疗的患者中,治疗前变量(HCV基因型、病毒载量、纤维化阶段)作为治疗结果预测指标的重要性较低。联合治疗的安全性反映了IFN和利巴韦林各自的安全性,没有协同作用。就病毒学、生化和组织学终点而言,IFN联合利巴韦林的联合治疗在HCV初始治疗中比IFN单药治疗更有效。这种联合治疗似乎耐受性良好,安全性可预测。