Suppr超能文献

比较β受体阻滞剂、钙拮抗剂和硝酸盐治疗稳定型心绞痛的试验的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of trials comparing beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, and nitrates for stable angina.

作者信息

Heidenreich P A, McDonald K M, Hastie T, Fadel B, Hagan V, Lee B K, Hlatky M A

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Calif, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1999 May 26;281(20):1927-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.20.1927.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Which drug is most effective as a first-line treatment for stable angina is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the relative efficacy and tolerability of treatment with beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, and long-acting nitrates for patients who have stable angina.

DATA SOURCES

We identified English-language studies published between 1966 and 1997 by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and reviewing the bibliographies of identified articles to locate additional relevant studies.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized or crossover studies comparing antianginal drugs from 2 or 3 different classes (beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, and long-acting nitrates) lasting at least 1 week were reviewed. Studies were selected if they reported at least 1 of the following outcomes: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, study withdrawal due to adverse events, angina frequency, nitroglycerin use, or exercise duration. Ninety (63%) of 143 identified studies met the inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers extracted data from selected articles, settling any differences by consensus. Outcome data were extracted a third time by 1 of the investigators. We combined results using odds ratios (ORs) for discrete data and mean differences for continuous data. Studies of calcium antagonists were grouped by duration and type of drug (nifedipine vs nonnifedipine).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Rates of cardiac death and myocardial infarction were not significantly different for treatment with beta-blockers vs calcium antagonists (OR, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.38; P = .79). There were 0.31 (95% CI, 0.00-0.62; P = .05) fewer episodes of angina per week with beta-blockers than with calcium antagonists. beta-Blockers were discontinued because of adverse events less often than were calcium antagonists (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.86; P<.001). The differences between beta-blockers and calcium antagonists were most striking for nifedipine (OR for adverse events with beta-blockers vs nifedipine, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47-0.77). Too few trials compared nitrates with calcium antagonists or beta-blockers to draw firm conclusions about relative efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

beta-Blockers provide similar clinical outcomes and are associated with fewer adverse events than calcium antagonists in randomized trials of patients who have stable angina.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚哪种药物作为稳定型心绞痛的一线治疗最为有效。

目的

比较β受体阻滞剂、钙拮抗剂和长效硝酸盐类药物对稳定型心绞痛患者的相对疗效和耐受性。

数据来源

我们通过检索MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库,并查阅已识别文章的参考文献以查找其他相关研究,从而识别出1966年至1997年间发表的英文研究。

研究选择

对比较来自2或3种不同类别(β受体阻滞剂、钙拮抗剂和长效硝酸盐类药物)抗心绞痛药物且持续至少1周的随机或交叉研究进行了综述。如果研究报告了以下至少1项结果,则予以入选:心源性死亡、心肌梗死、因不良事件而退出研究、心绞痛发作频率、硝酸甘油使用情况或运动持续时间。在143项已识别的研究中,有90项(63%)符合纳入标准。

数据提取

两名独立的审阅者从选定的文章中提取数据,通过协商一致解决任何分歧。结果数据由一名研究人员第三次提取。我们使用离散数据的比值比(OR)和连续数据的均值差合并结果。钙拮抗剂的研究按药物持续时间和类型(硝苯地平与非硝苯地平)进行分组。

数据综合

β受体阻滞剂与钙拮抗剂治疗的心源性死亡和心肌梗死发生率无显著差异(OR,0.97;95%置信区间[CI],0.67 - 1.38;P = 0.79)。与钙拮抗剂相比,β受体阻滞剂每周的心绞痛发作次数少0.31次(95% CI,0.00 - 0.62;P = 0.05)。因不良事件停用β受体阻滞剂的情况比钙拮抗剂少(OR,0.72;95% CI,0.60 - 0.86;P < 0.001)。β受体阻滞剂与钙拮抗剂之间的差异在硝苯地平方面最为显著(β受体阻滞剂与硝苯地平不良事件的OR,0.60;95% CI,0.47 - 0.77)。比较硝酸盐类药物与钙拮抗剂或β受体阻滞剂的试验太少,无法就相对疗效得出确凿结论。

结论

在稳定型心绞痛患者的随机试验中,β受体阻滞剂提供了相似的临床结果,且与比钙拮抗剂更少的不良事件相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验