Suppr超能文献

产前护理对安全分娩有影响吗?印度北方邦城市地区的一项研究。

Does antenatal care make a difference to safe delivery? A study in urban Uttar Pradesh, India.

作者信息

Bloom S S, Lippeveld T, Wypij D

机构信息

Carolina Population Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 1999 Mar;14(1):38-48. doi: 10.1093/heapol/14.1.38.

Abstract

Evidence to support that antenatal screenings and interventions are effective in reducing maternal mortality has been scanty and studies have presented contradictory findings. In addition, antenatal care utilization is poorly characterized in studies. As an exposure under investigation, antenatal care should be well defined. However, measures typically only account for the frequency and timing of visits and not for care content. We introduce a new measure for antenatal care utilization, comprised of 20 input components covering care content and visit frequency. Weights for each component reflect its relative importance to better maternal and child health, and were derived from a survey of international researchers. This composite measure for antenatal care utilization was studied in a probability sample of 300 low to middle income women who had given birth within the last three years in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. Results showed that demarcating women's antenatal care status based on a simple indicator--two or more visits versus less--masked a large amount of variation in care received. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the effect of antenatal care utilization on the likelihood of using safe delivery care, a factor known to decrease maternal mortality. After controlling for relevant socio-demographic and maternity history factors, women with a relatively high level of care (at the 75th percentile of the score) had an estimated odds of using trained assistance at delivery that was almost four times higher than women with a low level of care (at the 25th percentile of the score) (OR = 3.97, 95% CI = 1.96, 8.10). Similar results were obtained for women delivering in a health facility versus at home. This strong positive association between level of care obtained during pregnancy and the use of safe delivery care may help explain why antenatal care could also be associated with reduced maternal mortality.

摘要

支持产前筛查和干预措施能有效降低孕产妇死亡率的证据一直很少,而且各项研究结果相互矛盾。此外,产前保健利用情况在研究中的描述并不充分。作为一项正在研究的暴露因素,产前保健应得到明确界定。然而,相关措施通常仅考虑就诊频率和时间,而未涉及保健内容。我们引入了一种新的产前保健利用衡量指标,它由涵盖保健内容和就诊频率的20个输入要素组成。每个要素的权重反映了其对改善母婴健康的相对重要性,这些权重来自对国际研究人员的一项调查。我们在印度北方邦瓦拉纳西市对过去三年内生过孩子的300名低收入和中等收入妇女的概率样本中,研究了这种产前保健利用综合指标。结果显示,仅根据一个简单指标(两次或更多次就诊与少于两次就诊)来划分妇女的产前保健状况,掩盖了她们所接受保健的大量差异。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以检验产前保健利用情况对使用安全分娩护理可能性的影响,而安全分娩护理是一个已知可降低孕产妇死亡率的因素。在控制了相关社会人口统计学和孕产史因素后,保健水平相对较高的妇女(得分处于第75百分位数)在分娩时使用专业助产的估计几率几乎是保健水平较低的妇女(得分处于第25百分位数)的四倍(比值比=3.97,95%置信区间=1.96,8.10)。在医疗机构分娩的妇女与在家分娩的妇女也得到了类似结果。孕期获得的保健水平与使用安全分娩护理之间这种强烈的正相关关系,或许可以解释为什么产前保健也可能与降低孕产妇死亡率有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验