Wilen S B, Stone B M
Medical Horizons Unlimited, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Physician Exec. 1998 Nov-Dec;24(6):36-41.
Accountability has become the fact of life for the health care provider and the delivery system. Until recently, accountability has been viewed primarily through the judicial process as issues of fraud and liability, or by managed care entities through evaluation of the financial bottom line. It is this second consideration and its ramifications that will be explored in this article. Appropriate measurement tools are needed to evaluate services, delivery, performance, customer satisfaction, and outcomes assessment. Measurement tools will be considered in light of the industry's unique considerations and realities. All participants, including insurers, employers, management, and health care providers and recipients, bear responsibilities which necessitate assessment and analysis. However, until the basic question, "Who is the customer?" is resolved, accountability issues remain complex and obscured. Accountability costs and impacts must be evaluated over time. They go way beyond bottom line cost containment and reduction. Accountability will be accomplished when the health care industry implements quality and measurement concepts that yield the highest levels of validity and appropriateness for health care delivery.
问责制已成为医疗服务提供者和医疗服务体系的生活现实。直到最近,问责制主要是通过司法程序被视为欺诈和责任问题,或者是由管理式医疗实体通过评估财务底线来考量。本文将探讨的正是这第二种考量及其影响。需要合适的衡量工具来评估服务、服务提供、绩效、客户满意度和结果评估。将根据该行业的独特考量因素和实际情况来考虑衡量工具。所有参与者,包括保险公司、雇主、管理层以及医疗服务提供者和接受者,都承担着需要进行评估和分析的责任。然而,在基本问题“谁是客户?”得到解决之前,问责制问题仍然复杂且模糊不清。问责成本和影响必须随着时间推移进行评估。它们远远超出了底线成本控制和削减的范畴。当医疗行业实施能为医疗服务带来最高有效性和适宜性水平的质量和衡量概念时,问责制才能实现。