Suppr超能文献

产前遗传学中的非指导性原则:患者自行领会言外之意。

Nondirectiveness in prenatal genetics: patients read between the lines.

作者信息

Anderson G

机构信息

Division of Social Science, Ethics and Law, Shriver Center for Mental Retardation Inc., Waltham, MA 02254, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 1999 Mar;6(2):126-36. doi: 10.1177/096973309900600205.

Abstract

For decades questionnaires have been used to measure the cognitive and psychological effects of prenatal genetic testing, but little is known about why some women undergo testing and others decline. Research indicates that many factors influence decision making, including values and beliefs. What is often denied rather than recognized is that the professional and personal values and beliefs held by the health care provider influence the patient's decision. It is assumed that, if genetic services are delivered in a nondirective manner, patients will not be affected by the provider's personal and professional standpoint. The qualitative research data reported here challenge this assumption. Getting to know patients' moral understanding and patterns of ethical reasoning by listening to their personal stories is recommended as a better way for nurses to help patients to make informed and autonomous decisions about prenatal genetic screening or diagnostic tests.

摘要

几十年来,问卷调查一直被用于衡量产前基因检测的认知和心理影响,但对于为何有些女性接受检测而另一些女性拒绝检测,人们了解甚少。研究表明,许多因素会影响决策,包括价值观和信念。常常被忽视而非被认识到的是,医疗服务提供者所秉持的专业和个人价值观及信念会影响患者的决策。人们假定,如果以非指导性方式提供基因服务,患者将不会受到提供者个人和专业立场的影响。此处报告的定性研究数据对这一假定提出了质疑。建议护士通过倾听患者的个人故事来了解其道德理解和伦理推理模式,这是帮助患者就产前基因筛查或诊断检测做出明智且自主决策的更好方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验