García Elisa, Timmermans Danielle R M, van Leeuwen Evert
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Feb;66(3):753-64. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.10.010. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome and other chromosomal anomalies has become common obstetrical practice. The purpose of this intervention is to provide women with the information needed to make informed reproductive choices. It is assumed that the ethical beliefs of parents play an important role in decision-making about whether to undergo testing, but little is known about their precise significance. More insight into how women conceptualize their choice of using prenatal screening tests may clarify the impact of personal ethical beliefs. With this aim, we conducted qualitative research consisting of semi-structured interviews with 59 women in the Netherlands who were offered a prenatal screening test. The analysis showed that the ethical views between acceptors and decliners showed similar diversity. In contrast with the currently accepted view, we conclude that ethical beliefs are one of the factors implicated in the decision. Women decide about prenatal testing by balancing the information provided by the test against the risks of further investigation, the emotional burden of a disabled child on their well-being and life perspective, as well as on those of family members. Normative moral principles are introduced once the choice is made, namely as factors in justifying and supporting the decision.
唐氏综合征及其他染色体异常的产前筛查已成为常见的产科操作。这种干预措施的目的是为女性提供做出明智生育选择所需的信息。人们认为,父母的道德观念在决定是否接受检测的过程中起着重要作用,但对于其确切意义却知之甚少。深入了解女性如何看待自己选择使用产前筛查检测,可能会阐明个人道德观念的影响。出于这一目的,我们进行了定性研究,对荷兰59名接受产前筛查检测的女性进行了半结构化访谈。分析表明,接受检测者和拒绝检测者的道德观念呈现出相似的多样性。与目前公认的观点不同,我们得出结论,道德观念是影响这一决定的因素之一。女性通过权衡检测提供的信息与进一步检查的风险、残疾儿童给她们的幸福和生活前景以及家庭成员带来的情感负担,来决定是否进行产前检测。一旦做出选择,规范性道德原则就会被引入,作为为该决定提供正当理由和支持的因素。